A Frank Take

Commercial Fishing Industrialized Oceans Long Before Offshore Wind

Burning of fossil fuels far greater threat to industry than turbines

Share

Weighted bottom trawling nets, some as large as football fields, are dragged along the seafloor, scraping, smothering, and scarring it. (Greenpeace)

Ever since the Block Island Wind Farm first became an idea more than a decade ago, the commercial fishing industry has that warned offshore turbines will industrialize the ocean and negatively impact ecosystems.

The executive director of the Commercial Fisheries Center of Rhode Island recently expressed those concerns to ecoRI News. Fred Mattera said:

“What I like is using good, sound science to make decisions. We have been impetuous. It is human nature to build things first and face the consequences later.”

“I actually wish [wind farms] would just go away and we start to build nuclear plants. Industrializing the ocean is not the way to manage an ecosystem.”

Offshore wind turbines, especially during construction, certainly add to the cacophony of underwater noise created by yachts (mega or otherwise), container ships, barges, oil and gas drilling, sonar, and military exercises that stress marine mammals and other sea life.

Centuries of commercial fishing and whaling also industrialized the oceans. They have had a profound impact on the marine environment. Combined with the extraction, transportation, and the burning of fossil fuels at sea, these two industries have caused significant marine distress.

Let’s examine Mattera’s call for sound science.

Bottom trawling is a widespread industrial fishing practice that involves dragging heavy nets, large metal doors, and chains over the seafloor. About a quarter of the wild seafood that the world consumes comes from the ocean floor. Cod, founder, skate, sole, and other bottom-dwelling species that roam this space get caught in huge nets.

These massive nets annually capture millions of tons of fish worth billions of dollars. They also catch and kill sponges, starfish, worms, and other bottom-dwellers. This bycatch slaughter disrupts an intricate ecosystem.

“Trawling destroys the natural seafloor habitat by essentially rototilling the seabed. All of the bottom-dwelling plants and animals are affected, if not outright destroyed, by tearing up root systems or animal burrows,” according to the U.S. Geological Survey. “Resuspending bottom sediment changes the entire chemistry of the water, including nutrient levels.”

The federal agency noted resuspended sediment can lower light levels in the water and reduce photosynthesis in ocean-dwelling plants, the foundation of the marine food web.

Bottom trawling smooths out the wrinkles of canyons on the continental slope, making marine mountainsides look more like plowed fields and changing the habitat of sea creatures, according to a 2012 study.

A 2016 study called bottom trawling “the most widespread anthropogenic activity that impacts the seabed on the continental shelf.” It noted estimates have suggested that an area half the size of the world’s continental shelf is trawled every year.

“The global calculations were a big surprise, and we calculated them at least 10 times to make sure we were not making a mistake,” said one of the study’s co-authors. “I am still in awe of these results and their environmental implications.”

Globally, 8.6 million square miles “are subject to chronic commercial trawling and dredging each year,” with 3.7 million square miles “occurring in soft sediment of continental shelves,” according to another study published in 2016.

A 2017 study referred to bottom trawling as “the most widespread source of physical disturbance to the world’s seabed.”

Commercial fishing gear that is dragged along the seafloor to capture species that live on, in, or near the ocean bottom has long been criticized for damaging fragile habitats and catching innumerable non-target species.

Basically, bottom trawling eradicates ecosystems. Hundreds of pounds of dead discards are common in a single tow. There’s little difference between bottom trawling and strip mining or clear-cutting.

Otter trawling, which is used to catch cod, flounder, haddock, and other groundfish, is the most common fishing method in New England. It uses two large metal doors to hold open the net as it drags along the seafloor. It was found to be the least harmful of the methods researchers assessed. Otter trawls killed 6% percent of the marine organisms in the way each time the net passed, according to the 2017 study.

The researchers also studied beam trawling, a method that uses a metal beam to hold open the net; towed dredges that drag a toothed metal bar along the seafloor, used in New England’s scallop fishery; and hydraulic dredges, which use a jet of water to loosen the seabed to capture surf clams and ocean quahogs living in the sediment.

Hydraulic dredges caused the most damage, killing 41% of animal and plant life on the seabed. The study found trawling removes 6% to 41% of faunal biomass per pass. The amount of damage caused by each gear type depends on how deep the machinery penetrates the seafloor. The further it penetrates, the more damage caused.

The researchers also found that ecosystem recovery times post-trawling ranged between 1.9 and 6.4 years depending on the fishery and the environmental circumstances.

In areas that have cold-water corals or glass sponges, however, recovery times can stretch from decades to centuries. Those species grow slowly, or once they are wiped out, it is harder for their larvae or juveniles to re-establish. Habitats with gravel or cobblestones can take a decade or more to recover.

Sandy habitats that are typical of large areas of the continental shelf can recover from trawling in just a few months, especially if they are only trawled once or twice annually, according to the study.

Dragging nets through the sand isn’t just a threat to marine life, however. A study published in January found that stirring up carbon-rich sediment on the seafloor releases about 370 million metric tons of carbon dioxide every year, roughly the same as running 100 coal-fired power plants.

A similar study published in 2021 found that bottom trawling unlocks a significant amount of carbon from the seafloor.

The world’s oceans absorb about a quarter of all the carbon dioxide that humans belch into the air. In fact, more CO2 is stored in the sea than in all the soil and plants on Earth. The oceans, however, aren’t a closed system. They both absorb and emit carbon, and most climate policies don’t take emissions from ocean-based activities such as bottom trawling into account.

I’m not advocating that we ban fishing, nor am I trying to disparage the occupation. My point is to highlight the industry’s collective disconnect with reality. Commercial fishing already has and will further suffer from the impacts of global warming. The continued burning of fossil fuels is a far greater threat to the industry (and to human and non-human life) than offshore wind turbines.

During the past two centuries, the world’s oceans have absorbed more than 150 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide emitted from human activities, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Ocean carbon dioxide concentrations are now higher than at any time during the past 800,000 years, and the “current rate of increase is likely unprecedented.”

Ocean acidification, caused by our relentless burning of fossil fuels, is likely to alter the oceanic food web and stress a human food supply. It’s bad news for marine life with calcium carbonate in their shells or skeletons, such as corals, crabs, and mollusks. Studies have found that more acidic salt waters make it more difficult for mussels, oysters, and scallops to develop their hardened protection.

A 2015 study listed Rhode Island, Massachusetts, and Connecticut among the states whose shellfish industries are at long-term economic risk from the impact of ocean acidification.

A 2021 report produced by the Massachusetts Special Legislative Commission on Ocean Acidification found the industry could suffer serious losses by the end of the century if the problem goes unaddressed.

Acidification affects other life vital to the marine ecosystem, including reef-building corals and pteropods — tiny snails eaten by numerous species, including whales. Acidic seawater also makes it more difficult for some species, such as clownfish, to sense predators, for sharks to hunt prey, and for squid to develop.

In the laboratory, many harmful algal species produce more toxins and bloom faster in acidified waters. “A similar response in the wild could harm people eating contaminated shellfish and sicken fish and marine mammals,” according to NOAA.

The Gulf of Maine’s kelp forests, a foundation for marine life, face widespread collapse as the oceans warm, The Boston Globe’s David Abel recently reported.

Cashes Ledge is an underwater mountain range off the New England coast that is home to a diversity of life, such as Atlantic wolffish. (Brian Skerry)

Let’s examine Mattera’s call for ecosystem management.

During the Obama administration, efforts to create a marine national monument protection area in the Atlantic, off the New England coast, were met with significant opposition from the fishing industry.

Cashes Ledge is a roughly 500-square-mile undersea mountain chain about 80 miles east of Gloucester, Mass. The chain includes a large kelp forest that provides habitat for a diverse collection of marine life, including Atlantic cod.

The area has been closed to bottom trawling since the early 2000s, but other fishing methods are allowed.

Supporters of making it a marine monument area argued that this important ecosystem needs to be better protected — essentially the same argument the commercial fishing industry has made about siting wind turbines near Cox’s Ledge, a rich fishing habitat about 25 miles southeast of Point Judith, R.I.

The hypocrisy is rich in the industry’s arguments. Protect our fishing areas from other uses — even ones that could help the industry in the long run — but ignore our presence.

The fishing industry, most notably the four fisheries — lobster, red crab, swordfish, and whiting — that regularly work Cashes Ledge, claimed big, well-funded environmental organizations were using their money and power to marginalize them. They alleged non-governmental organizations were negotiating with government regulators behind closed doors.

They suggested these NGOs should use the money they spend on lawsuits to help develop better science, which they said would better protect marine resources and create better management practices.

Science has repeatedly warned us about the devastating impacts that have and will continue to result from the climate crisis. Quickly and dramatically reducing fossil fuel burning is the solution.

Gillnetting is a regular commercial fishing practice. It is widely used in Rhode Island waters. The net can be a mile or more long, sits on the bottom, and comes up about 10 feet. Fish that swim into the net get their gills ensnared and can’t escape.

When the net is hauled up, the fish and other creatures caught are sorted. Those who are desired and legal for sale are put on ice and those who are unwanted or not of legal size are thrown overboard. Since these fish have been trapped by their gills, most of the discarded are dead.

A humpback whale entangled in fishing gear. (Keith Yip/NOAA)

Research has estimated that about 300,000 whales and dolphins die annually due to entanglement in fishing gear, according to the International Whaling Commission (IWC). That’s a lot of takes.

“Entanglement is also a serious welfare issue,” according to the IWC. “It can lead to drowning as trapped animals cannot reach the surface to breathe, to laceration and infection as heavy ropes bite through skin, and to starvation as animals towing heavy fishing gear cannot feed effectively.”

Earlier this year a North Atlantic right whale was killed and washed up on Martha’s Vineyard with clear injuries from rope entanglements. NOAA conducted an investigation, concluding the whale died from chronic entanglement of commercial fishing gear linked to the Maine lobster industry.

Endangered North Atlantic right whales face multiple stressors in the “highly industrialized waters” of the western North Atlantic, most notably entanglements in fishing gear and collisions with vessels, according to a 2022 study.

Abandoned, lost, or carelessly discarded fishing gear can continue to catch target and non-target species indiscriminately for years. (Michael Pitts/World Wildlife Fund)

The study noted entanglements typically occur in fixed fishing gear, including lobster and crab pots, and gillnets after a whale collides with ropes in the water column.

A 30-year assessment of entanglement scars (1980-2009) showed nearly 83% of the North Atlantic right whale population has been entangled at least once, and some individuals as many as seven times.

While most fishing gear interactions result in only scars, the rate of serious entanglements — those with attached gear or severe injuries — has been increasing and entanglements are now the leading cause of serious injury and mortality in this species.

Abandoned, lost, or discarded fishing gear is a major contributor to ocean pollution, with extensive social, economic, and environmental impacts, according to a 2022 research article.

The authors estimated that nearly 2% of all fishing gear — some 84 square miles of trawl nets, 1,144 square miles of gillnets, 28,977 square miles of purse seine nets, 459,556 miles of longline mainlines, 13 billion longline hooks, and some 25 million pots and traps — are lost to the ocean annually.

“Ghost fishing results in potentially substantial losses of protein resources, habitat damage, and the ensnarement of threatened and endangered species,” according to the paper.

A 2019 report by Greenpeace estimated that 640,000 tons of ghost gear enters the oceans annually. The organization has estimated ghost gear makes up 10% of marine plastic waste.

Ghost gear often ensnares animals that aren’t being harvested. Diamondback terrapins provide a case study of how this debris can impact animal populations.

These turtles inhabit salt marshes along the East Coast, including in southern New England, where people also fish for blue crabs. Blue crabs are caught using a metal cage that is dropped to the marsh floor and tied to a buoy. If the buoy becomes detached, fishers may not be able to find the gear, and it becomes a ghost pot.

These pots have tiny openings that allow crabs to enter but not escape. Terrapins also swim into the pots, attracted by the bait. Since they are social animals, a single pot can capture more than one turtle.

In a single Georgia tidal marsh, 130 diamondback terrapin carcasses were observed in abandoned crab pots, consisting of more than double the remaining estimated population, according to the authors of a 2009 paper.

To my knowledge, no offshore wind opponent has showed up at a public meeting outraged by this pollution, or carrying a bag of locally collected ghost gear.

Note: In pelagic trawling, the net is placed on the surface of open water and is used to catch anchovies, shrimp, tuna, herring, and mackerel. These trawls are generally much larger than bottom trawls and can be towed by one or two boats.

Frank Carini can be reached at [email protected]. His opinions don’t reflect those of ecoRI News.

Categories

Join the Discussion

View Comments

Recent Comments

  1. Well researched article Frank. Oceanic and coastal fisheries have significant impacts on fisheries and their habitats. Marine debris and microplastics are other serious impacts affecting marine ecosystems. And I agree that while offshore wind turbines cause fishery habitat impacts, the burning of fossil fuels and corresponding increasing ambient temperatures and ocean acidification result in much greater scale impacts to fisheries and marine habitat. And to add, with climate change, we are experiencing unprecedented sea level rise, an increasing regularity in higher-than-predicted tidal events, and increasing winds and coastal storms that are wrecking havoc on saltmarshes and other nearshore habitats that are essential habitat for many fish and other marine organisms. Lastly, our streams and rivers are ecologically linked to estuarine and oceanic ecosystems, and numerous dams, failing culverts, and runoff that degrades water and sediment quality impact river herring, shad and other migratory species that provide a forage base for both marine and freshwater ecosystems. Collectively, we are faced with great challenges to helping sustain our oceanic fisheries, the source well beyond the siting and installation of wind turbines.

  2. This is an engaging perspective on the environmental damages of commercial fishing of which most people are unaware. To your point that commercial fishing has industrialized the oceans for a long period, the 8 billion people on earth have industrialized the atmosphere and the land as well. The notion that offshore wind is the first industrialization of the ocean is false argument.

  3. https://tos.org/oceanography/article/offshore-wind-farm-artificial-reefs-affect-ecosystem-structure-and-functioning-a-synthesis?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR0va0oXKE-l_vVVGjxkHCcE4SQonaNhCXQROO-aPAIl-XhDqQq_GQjG5mw_aem_giBm7D_xqpqvvjyCOn3fSA

    In this study you’ll find it says offshore wind will make ocean waters warmer and more acidic. Commercial fishing is disruptive but is managed to be as less invasive as possible and sustainable. Commercial fishing brings a heart healthy food source to the American people and offshore wind WILL directly impact that food source. Offshore Wind is major construction of the seafood. Piledriving 40 foot pylons at over 240 dbs, jetplowing 6 foot trenches, boulder relocation, dumping tons of imported rock and cement mattresses for scour protection, electrifying the ocean floor in grids with over 220kilovolts of electricity emitting harmful magnetic fields that disrupt marine life’s ability to navigate and hunt. Let’s not mention its all being planned in whale migratory routes and the Altantic Flyway. Birds and bats will also be affected along with marine life. The biggest impact if we went 100% offshore wind would be our coastal communities. Our fishing heritage would be cast aside for foreign energy companies. We aren’t just selling off millions of acres of our ocean we are selling centuries of hard working families that harvest from our oceans and respect our ocean. These foreign conglomerates are just here for one thing and when their contracts are up they could careless about the damages they’ve left behind.

  4. America was founded off fishermen. You are ruining our traditions with fluff pieces like this.

    Offshore wind is destroying more habitat and you are ok with it.

    Shameful

  5. This is nothing but a propaganda piece. Bottom trawling does not permanently destroy the seafloor. Offshore wind requires dredging 6-8 deep x 140 wide trenches to bury cable and then covering it all with boulders. There are 155 miles of array cable and another 42 miles of export cable for just Revolution Wind where the seabed has been permanently altered and the entire the ecosystem changed. Add to that all the miles of buried cable for Vineyard Wind and the alarming (over 500 miles) of buried cable for SouthCoast Wind.

  6. Wow Frank. A very strong argument for the continuation of our attempting to mitigate climate change which appears to be exacerbated by the burning of fossil fuels especially as it relates to the fishing industry

    I found it very interesting that the fishing industry rep mentioned a return to nuclear power generation.

    Unless the technology has drastically changed, nuclear plants (as well as fossil fuel plants) located on the coast in New England were responsible for the entrainment of billions and billions of eggs and larvae of many species of marine organisms over the years. Although adult equivalency models were attempted for each plant over the years never was there an attempt to address the impact of all New England Power Plants combined. This doesn’t even include the hundreds of thousands of juvenile and mature fishes impinged annually.

    It’s pretty clear from what I’ve seen just outside the east and west walls of point judith that bottom trawling is counter productive. How many dead young black seabass, scup, and sculpins does one need to see daily to know that even local dragging is a losing proposition.

    Certainly a return to coastally located once through cooling nuclear power plants is an idea that should be buried along with the nuclear waste we’ve already generated, at least as far as fisheries impacts are concerned.

    Great job as usual Frank.

  7. Fluff piece! You may not agree with some or all of Frank’s take on this one, but calling it a fluff piece just shows you’re unable to engage in a meaningful conversation at this time. Hopefully that will change for you.

  8. Thank your for this piece Frank. I think there needs to be a lot more education like this about the effects of the ocean acidification that has already started due to excess CO2, and what that means for the future of fisheries. I would add that the impacts of loss of oxygen in our oceans are also quite serious.

    Some great work by an international team of scientists on how the climate crisis is making our oceans hot, sour, and breathless: https://phys.org/news/2013-11-scientists-hot-sour-breathless-oceans.html

  9. You totally misread the paper. It says that the communities attached to offshore wind turbines “are being subjected to a warmer and acidified marine environment,” not that they are causing the changes.

  10. If you knew more about HVDC substations you would realize that you’re the one who misunderstood the paper. HVDC substations can cycle through up to 8,000,000 gallons of sea water each day heating it up to temperature in the 90s cooking and killing fish larvae, plankton and other microbes that are unable to be filtered out. Chlorine is added to the water before it is expelled back into the ocean to prevent corrosion of internal components of the substation. Google BOEMs HVDC white paper.

  11. Frank’s research is on the mark – good science published in good peer reviewed journals. He manages to explain what scientists, including myself, are often not as good at. Although I have used the analogy of dredging on Georges Bank being like clear cutting a forest, after being sea on NOAA ships and deploying ROV to take video of the George’s Bank Sea Floor.These studies were begun because of the collapse of the cod and haddock fisheries on the Bank. Thank you Frank for presenting this perspective on the science important to understanding the impact of fisheries, and potential solutions – such protection of Cashes Ledge which is a nursery for cod. How is it fair for Fred Mattera to urge the use of science only when it agree with what you want to hear?

  12. HVDC stations are really only absolutely necessary for long transmission lengths more common in Europe. They aren’t a necessity here unless we get to a networked grid offshore or we build out all viable closer to shore locations.

  13. Frank’s holistic perspective is what’s needed if we are going to eventually find climate stability in the 21st century. Unfortunately, systems thinking is not how most people approach problems like climate change. A similar analysis about farming and solar development would show that ecologically sound solar farms with elevated panels are much better than the topsoil loss and use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides generally associated with farming. Integrating solar energy production with farming is a great way to let the land heal from practices that can only be viewed as ecologically destructive. Systems thinking that does not assume resources extraction practices used now are optimal or sustainable is necessary to find a path forward that is socially and ecologically sound.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your support keeps our reporters on the environmental beat.

Reader support is at the core of our nonprofit news model. Together, we can keep the environment in the headlines.

cookie