Wildlife & Nature

Wind Turbines Pose Problem for Local Bat Populations

New technology tracks bat migration patterns through Rhode Island


Wind turbine owners have reported dead bats at the base of their structures. (istock)

The Pettersson D500X ultrasound recorder looks a bit like an old-fashioned transistor radio, with square buttons, a modest display screen and a built-in microphone. But despite its unimaginative appearance, the device can detect the echolocation sounds made by bats and, with the help of software that identifies the bat species involved, is helping scientists reveal new information about the movements and migration behavior of local bat populations.

Biologists at the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (DEM) and the University of Rhode Island have deployed the bat detectors throughout the state this year in a variety of ways. DEM wildlife biologist Charles Brown, for instance, mounts one on the roof of his truck as he periodically drives five routes around the state to look for trends in bat numbers and to compare his findings with those driving similar routes in other states. He also places the devices in various state wildlife management areas to scout for locations to trap bats for more detailed study.

The most revealing use of the detectors, however, has been as a way of monitoring bat migration through Rhode Island.

“Not a lot is known about bat migration, so we’re just trying to figure it out for various reasons,” Brown said. “There’s a great interest in wind turbine development — turbines kill hundreds of thousands of bats every year — so we want to know when they migrate and where.”

Brown selected several locations along the Rhode Island coast to place the detectors for long-term monitoring of bat movements. Every week since early August, he has downloaded the data from the detectors to learn what he can about the seasonal movement of bats.

“Much like birds, they migrate at the same times and during the same general weather patterns,” Brown said. “They head south until they hit the coast and then they follow the coastline. There are certain locations where you’d expect them to pile up and be concentrated, like Point Judith, Sakonnet Point, Beavertail, Brenton Point.”

While he admitted he didn’t know what to expect with the data he was collecting, he was somewhat surprised to learn that bat migration appears to begin much earlier than he anticipated.

“We’re seeing pulses of activity beginning in August, and I’m not sure that’s well known,” Brown said. “But they’re opportunistic animals, so when they get the right weather conditions, they probably just figure that this is a good time to go.”

Bat migration is believed to continue through October and early November.

The only difficulty with the bat detectors is that it’s impossible to know how many bats are being detected.

“It might detect a thousand calls in one night, but we don’t know if it’s a thousand bats flying by or one bat that flew by a thousand times,” he said. “There’s no way to differentiate it.”

Most of the bats Brown has detected are red, hoary and silver-haired bats — collectively called tree bats — all of which migrate south each fall. He also occasionally detects small numbers of little brown bats that migrate north to hibernate in caves and mines in New Hampshire and Vermont. Little browns have declined dramatically in the past decade due to the effects of white-nose syndrome, a fungal disease that has killed millions of hibernating bats throughout the Northeast. Big brown bats, many of which spend the winter hibernating in Rhode Island, are also detected.

URI professor Peter August has conducted similar monitoring of bat migration at Napatree Point in Westerly using the same kind of detector, and his results mirror Brown’s.

“While in mid-summer I’d have a couple hundred bats passing by in a week, starting in August I’ve been getting a couple thousand in a week,” he said. “The activity has really peaked.”

August plans to continue to monitor for bat activity at Napatree until he detects no bats at all.

“Nothing brings great clouds of bats to Napatree in the summer, which is what I expected,” said August, who earned his doctorate studying bats in South America. “It’s not an active summertime habitat, but it changes this time of year. We have lots of bats moving around now. Our migratory bats are headed south, and our hibernating bats are moving around the area looking for places to hibernate.”

By combining data from the detectors with anecdotal information from other sources — such as surfers who report large movements of bats at sunrise and wind turbine owners who report dead bats at the base of the structures — Brown and August are piecing together the story of bat migration in Rhode Island.

“With all this information, we’re finally getting a better sense of what’s going on here,” Brown said. “The information we’re getting will give us a better sense of how big a problem wind towers will be for our bats. As more and more wind turbines pop up on the landscape, it’s probably going to be a problem. It’s already a problem. And then we’ll have to question whether the mortality is sustainable.”

Rhode Island resident and author Todd McLeish runs a wildlife blog.


Join the Discussion

View Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your support keeps our reporters on the environmental beat.

Reader support is at the core of our nonprofit news model. Together, we can keep the environment in the headlines.


We use cookies to improve your experience and deliver personalized content. View Cookie Settings