Government

As NOAA Evaluates Rhode Island’s CRMC, Advocates Push to Dissolve Agency’s Decision-Making Council

Share

A 550-foot-long stone revetment was built illegally along the 14th hole of the Quidnessett Country Club. (QCC)

PROVIDENCE — Chris Powell knows the score when it comes to coastal regulations in Rhode Island.

A retired wildlife biologist who spent decades working for the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (DEM) in its marine fisheries program, Powell knows the ins and outs of environmental permitting and regulations. His stint as a state employee included a temporary assignment to the state Coastal Resources Management Council, during a time when the regulatory agency was particularly short-staffed.

Powell had nothing but praise for the agency’s staff, both when he was assigned to the agency and after, when he interacted with CRMC staff as a member of the public. But he has concerns about the 10-member, politically appointed council that makes final decisions for the agency.

“CRMC has always had good staff where they try to do the right thing,” said Powell. “I attended many meetings, however, where the council overrode the recommendation of staff.”

Lifelong Rhode Islander and chairman of Warren’s Harbor Commission, Woody Kemp, has similar concerns. Warren is one of the smaller towns in Rhode Island, and thanks to sea level rise and coastal flooding, the town is shrinking. Kemp offered praise for the work completed by agency staff, but, he said, the council moves too slowly when making decisions. “It took us maybe 10 years to get approval for our harbor management plan,” he said.

“I would like to see more staff for timelier reviews of agency applications,” added Kemp.

Powell and Kemp were part of more than a dozen members of the public testifying in a state Department of Administration conference room recently about their experiences — on both sides of the table — with CRMC. The testimony is part of the evaluation process conducted regularly by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) of all the state coastal programs for which it provides funding and oversight as part of the 1972 Coastal Zone Management Act.

The CRMC is charged with regulating, developing and conserving the state’s 400 miles of coastline and ocean waters. But the agency’s council has a long history of controversy, of ignoring the broader public and, at times, the recommendations of CRMC staff when it comes to permitting decisions and project approvals.

Advocates of reforming the agency are putting pressure on NOAA to advise a restructuring of CRMC into a shape that abolishes the executive authority of the council.

Michael Migliori, the lead evaluator from NOAA, said his agency expects to have the final evaluation in January. Migliori didn’t say whether the findings would include action on the council.

“We’ll be working very hard considering the input we get from the public,” said Migliori. “We can’t promise any predetermined outcomes for action.”

CRMC is being evaluated on its program administration, public access, and offshore wind and climate resilience. Recommendations from the final report can be used for or against the agency when it comes to the CRMC’s budget allocation from NOAA. CRMC receives around half its annual operating budget from NOAA, so any reduction in the allocation would decimate its functions.

Almost all of the oral testimony last week involved CRMC’s council in some way. The coalition to abolish its executives functions includes environmental groups, recreational and commercial anglers, aquaculturists, shoreline access activists, waterfront property owners and other members of the public who have lost faith in the agency.

The council’s 10 members aren’t required to have qualifications in coastal policy, planning or development. The only requirement is that they live in a specific coastal community, or are otherwise an at-large member. Past members have included a liquor store owner, a dental hygienist, and the CEO of a chain of physical therapy offices. (One seat is always set aside for the DEM director, or a designee).

The council has regularly struggled to maintain a quorum, often having to cancel meetings — at times with the applicants already in the room — because council members do not show up to meetings. The result is an application process that faces numerous delays, despite staff and applicants having completed the necessary work to apply for a permit. As a body, the council can vote to table or otherwise delay controversial decisions, dragging the permitting process out for far longer than is reasonable for a government agency.

“Meeting once a month to hear six or seven applications isn’t enough,” said Warwick resident Richard Langseth. “They need to meet more often or find a way to speed the process up.”

The council’s list of controversial decisions is practically catechism at this point. In 2020, the council approved a controversial marina expansion and dredging project in Jamestown over the protests of town residents and even music legend James Taylor. In late 2020, the council quietly approved a backroom deal to expand Champlin’s Marina into Great Salt Pond, cutting out town officials and other stakeholders from the final negotiations. (The Rhode Island Supreme Court tossed out the agreement in 2022).

The most recent controversy involves the Quidnessett Country Club, which illegally constructed a seawall along its coastal golf course last year. The club alleges the seawall was necessary to save one of the holes on the course from erosion, but reform advocates have been calling foul since the seawall was discovered last year.

“They just went ahead and built an illegal seawall without approval of the council,” said Keith Hoffmann, chief of policy for Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha. “Despite this, the council is entertaining a petition from QCC to change the water type in front of its property, a regulation change that will ultimately delay enforcement against the club.”

Others at the session took aim at possible conflicts of interest involving the CRMC’s legal representation that have gone unaddressed by the council. Currently, the council’s official lawyer is Anthony DeSisto, who’s held the post since 2016. A typical council proceeding involves DeSisto and at least one other attorney from his law firm attending on behalf of council members, but not agency staff.

“The council has legal counsel, staff sit in meetings with applicants or petitioners who have legal counsel,” said Topher Hamblett, executive director of Save The Bay. “Staff has no legal counsel or representation, that’s not right.”

Environmental advocates also told NOAA that DeSisto himself has a conflict of interest; his law firm lobbies on Smith Hill during the legislative session, and works as a town solicitor for multiple municipalities, many of which deal with CRMC directly. An attorney from DeSisto’s firm has also been advising the agency’s new hearing officer, who’s currently hearing a contested case regarding an aquaculture farm in Tiverton.

Those in favor of abolishing the CRMC’s council point toward DEM as a model for how to handle in-house lawyers at a state agency.

Other issues include aquaculture and fisheries engagement. The state’s commercial anglers have long contended that the CRMC is too permissive when it comes to approving new industries that threaten to elbow fishing aside. The agency’s Fisherman’s Advisory Board (FAB) resigned en masse in protest last year, alleging the CRMC was too bullish about approving offshore wind projects at the cost of prime fishing areas.

Representatives from the New England chapter of Backcountry Hunters and Anglers and the Rhode Island Saltwater Anglers Association said the CRMC also had a conflict of interest within its aquaculture program. The agency’s aquaculture coordinator works on permits for new aquaculture farms while also advocating for the industry within Rhode Island, two functions that advocates say should be separated.

Attempts to reform the CRMC’s council via legislation have stalled in recent years. A 2022 study commission created by the House and chaired by then-Rep. Deborah Ruggiero, D-Jamestown, recommended lawmakers take action on reforming the agency and neutering the powers of its politically-appointed council.

Reform efforts saw a brand new stumbling block this year, when in June the House Fiscal Office released a questionable cost estimate on agency reform that said $2 million would have to be allocated to fund replacing the council. Environmental groups and advocates said the office had erred in its estimates and misread the legislation.

Reformers have pledged to continue introducing the legislation year after year, seeing its chances of passage improving the longer the council exists. In the meantime, advocates remain hopeful that federal officials can help change CRMC for the better and help it fulfill its mission.

“The Red Book is one of the best coastal management programs in the country,” said Powell, referencing the common name for CRMC’s thick rule book of regulations and procedures.

“The staffing issue just really needs to be worked out,” he added.

Members of the public seeking to submit written comments on the CRMC have until Oct. 25 to send them to NOAA’s lead evaluator, Migliori, at [email protected] with “Comments on Performance Evaluation of Rhode Island Coastal Management Program” in the subject line of the message.

Categories

Join the Discussion

View Comments

Recent Comments

  1. The CRMC should be made up of individuals that have a direct interest in coastal issues instead of uneducated political hacks that, especially in RI, decide issues based on “know a guy” connections. CRMC has become an embarrasment.

  2. Whenever I see the words “political appointment” in conjunction with any Rhode Island state agency, I shudder. The CRMC in its current form is a failure. It has completely lost sight of its original purpose. We need people on the CRMC who are dedicated to the preservation of our waters and coastlines, who have the dedication to do the work, and who are not beholden to the person who appointed them. There is a dedicated staff to advise them, so we don’t need lawyers, doctors and PhD’s to serve on the council. I’d much rather have a well-informed person with a strong sense of environmental advocacy who is willing to listen and act on staff recommendations than a well-connected do-nothing.

  3. Case in fact: 429 Sea View Dr. ,Warwick,RI , Oakland Beach. Some might remember two summer cottages went up in fire a few years ago. Sea view was the second believed to be arson,no one ever caught. History to lil’ cottage well the Hurricane in 54 wiped out the other two cottages on that end peninsula there facing the ocean. Sadly the occupants of the other two cottages perished taken out to sea. Then a Lady from Cranston quickly purchased all three lots, and one with a house still there. Later residing in the middle one still standing.The town was in the act of preventing sale of these properties condsidering them to vulnerable to more storms. But she got deeds and ink was dry. Later she lived there in he retirement when she passed it went to her daughter. It became a seasonal rent and off season also. But then the cesspool failed and other violations were discovered. Town advised daughter she no longer could rent it. She sold it then it was sold again to current owner, Well town had stipulated if a fire occurred rebuilding home wouldn’t be allowed. The new owner is very familiar with these matters being in real estate . She drove in a large rv onto the lot and started her campaign to build a home there. After yrs crmc finally gave her the green light. Currently she has a stilt house going up on cement pillars. But she was taxed the same for years even though she couldn’t use the house. She must of paid attys,engineers for years etc to have her Dream Home up and running. Hopefully these delays will never occur again.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your support keeps our reporters on the environmental beat.

Reader support is at the core of our nonprofit news model. Together, we can keep the environment in the headlines.

cookie