Land Use

1990s Law Designed to Build Natural Area Preserves Instead Created a Mystery

Share

A 30-year-old law that required Rhode Island to create protected areas to support rare and endangered species remains ignored. (Frank Carini/ecoRI News)

Three decades ago the Rhode Island General Assembly passed the Natural Areas Protection Act of 1993, to provide, among other things, the “highest level of protection to the state’s most environmentally sensitive natural areas.”

Late last year, Warwick resident Nathan Cornell, co-founder and president of the Rhode Island Old Growth Tree Society, began looking into the 30-year-old legislation. He found a mystery.

“I made a public records request for information on the Natural Area Preserves which was denied because the DEM apparently did not have any information on it,” Cornell wrote in a Dec. 5 email to ecoRI News. “It appears now that the Natural Area Preserve system was never created in Rhode Island.”

The Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (DEM) has never designated even one Natural Area Preserve. In fact, “No one currently at DEM recalls the genesis of this Act,” according to Jay Wegimont, the agency’s public affairs officer.

The legislation was supposed to elevate “the health and welfare of the people of Rhode Island by promoting the preservation of areas of unique natural interest for scientific, educational, recreational, cultural, and scenic purposes” and to “allow significant public and privately owned lands of critical environmental concern to be designated as natural area preserves.”

The law called for the DEM director to establish a system of preserves and ensure these areas are maintained in as natural and wild a state as is consistent with educational, scientific, biological, geological, paleontological, and scenic purposes. The director may also adopt regulations for establishing and managing the natural area preserve system, including procedures for the adoption and revision of a management plan for each designated preserve.

Cornell also reached out to the Rhode Island Natural History Survey, which took over the state’s Natural Heritage Program in 2007 — the longtime biodiversity program a victim of DEM budget cuts and a shift to making state-protected open space more recreational friendly.

“The Natural History Survey had to do a lot of digging to find anything that might be the areas that were supposed to be Natural Area Preserves,” Cornell wrote in that early December email.

Cornell said the Survey found a list of important natural areas, including 21 locations in Gloucester, 16 in West Greenwich, 14 in Foster, 10 in Coventry, and six in Cumberland, that had been created decades ago. He said some of the locations on that list have since been developed.

He recently told ecoRI News creating a Natural Area Preserves system for Rhode Island would be a “great resource” to help keep important ecosystems in their natural state and protect rare and endangered species, both plant and animal. He also called it a solution for protecting the state’s pockets of old-growth forests, which support many of the state’s rare and endangered species.

The University of Rhode Island graduate pointed to Virginia, which helped jump-start the creation of Natural Heritage programs throughout the country, as a model for Rhode Island when it comes to creating a Natural Area Preserve system.

Virginia has 66 Natural Area Preserves totaling 60,289 acres. Most of the state’s preserves are owned by the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, but some are lands owned by other state and local government agencies, universities, private individuals, and conservation organizations.

Since the creation of a Natural Area Preserve system could start anytime, the Old Growth Tree Society has made an official request to DEM that six areas be designated as preserves. These sites include old-growth forests and areas with unique ecological characteristics, according to Cornell.

Cornell said DEM director Terry Gray responded, via email, thanking the organization for “bringing the matter to his attention and said the whole process of designating natural area preserves was new to him and he was going to look into it.”

Gray also told Cornell that he has tasked DEM staff to outline how a Natural Area Preserve system would work and to look into the potential benefits of creating one.

“This is a new process for me so I’ve asked staff to not only outline how it works but also to look [at] the benefits of what you have requested,” Gray wrote in a late-November email. “Some preliminary feedback I received is that a lot of those properties are already protected … but I haven’t gone through everything yet.”

Wegimont noted the newly created Rhode Island Forest Conservation Commission, formed under the Rhode Island Forest Conservation Act, is charged with developing the criteria necessary for defining the state’s most important forestland. He said these important forestlands and characteristics may be used in future determinations for land conservation.

“Once this happens, we will have a more modern and scientific basis to determine if an area within RI should be designated as a Natural Area Preserve,” he wrote in a recent email to ecoRI News. “With that said, the Forest Conservation Commission is not charged with directly designating Natural Area Preserves and would not have the authority to do so without amendment to that law but their work would be hugely beneficial in any designations proposed under the older law.”

Cornell noted management areas and state forests can and are timber harvested.

“For example, the Great Swamp is a management area … that means they’re logging there,” he said. “And there’s areas in the Great Swamp that should not be logged, because there’s rare and endangered species in certain areas. There’s old-growth forest in there. The whole thing is not old-growth forest, but there are pockets of old-growth and they should not be a management area. We need to protect those areas in their natural state because they’re beautiful.”

Here is a look at the six sites the Old Growth Tree Society has recommended as preserves (the forests in any location designated a Natural Area Preserve must be left alone and any clear-cutting, timber harvesting, or tree planting would be prohibited):

John L. Curran State Park (Cranston)

Owner: DEM.

Reason for designation: The 300-acre park contains mature forest with a large diversity of native tree species, including American beech, yellow birch, white ash, hickory, black tupelo, red oak, white oak, black oak, and sassafras, with native understory trees such as American hornbeam, American hophornbeam, and witch hazel. The park contains one of the largest intact American beech forests in Rhode Island, and an old-growth eastern white pine forest. There’s an American beech tree more than 8 feet in circumference, which is likely 200-plus years old.

The Pawtuxet River American Beech Forest (Warwick)

Owner: Rhode Island Department of Transportation.

Reason for designation: The 18-acre site contains a mature American beech forest, with the largest trees reaching about 8 feet in circumference. There are red oaks in this forest up to 11 feet in circumference and close to 100 feet tall. The site is an emerging old-growth forest with a rich diversity of native tree species, including swamp white oaks, red maples, and black birch, with a native understory of mountain laurel.

Old Growth Forests in the Great Swamp Management Area (South Kingstown)

Owner: State of Rhode Island.

Reason for designation: In this 350-acre area, there are pockets of old-growth forest, with the older trees believed to be 200 to 300 years old. While the entire area is not old-growth, it includes much needed buffer areas to protect those areas. The vast majority of the Great Swamp is not old-growth, as it was likely logged in the mid-1800s to early 1900s. The area features red and white oaks, black tupelos, American beech, and yellow birch. The understory contains mountain laurel, and there are no invasives present in the heart of the old-growth pockets.

Dawley Farm Forest (Warwick)

Owner: City of Warwick.

Reason for designation: This 63-acre site is a mature forest with pockets of emerging old-growth forest. There is large yellow birch and pignut hickory, an unusual combination in Rhode Island. There is also a wide diversity of native tree species, including mature American beech, red oak, white oak, black oak, sassafras, red maple, red cedar, pitch pine, and American sycamore. While not a primary old-growth forest with a history of farming, this forest regenerated in the 1800s with numerous trees core dated to be more than 100 years old. Some of the older trees in the forest have been core dated to predate the Civil War.

In December, the Warwick City Council voted to protect the property by public trust, the first city parcel so preserved under a 2021 state law.

CCRI/ Kent County Old Growth Forest (Warwick)

Owner: State of Rhode Island State Colleges Board of Trustees and Kent County Memorial Hospital.

Reason for designation: This 6-acre site contains a rich diversity of native species, including mature American beech, yellow birch, white oak, red oak, sassafras, and American sycamore, with an understory of American hornbeam, American hophornbeam, witch hazel, and wild blueberries. The trees in this forest are most likely between 200 and 300 years old.

URI North Woods (South Kingstown)

Owner: State of Rhode Island, Board of Governors for Higher Education, Office of Chief Legal Counsel.

Reason for designation: This 254-acre site contains a diversity of native tree species, including ash and yellow birch. The area also contains an American hornbeam forest, which is rare in Rhode Island. Currently, students and professors at the University of Rhode Island use the forest for research, including soil studies and species identification.

Cornell noted that the key aspect of the Natural Heritage Program, when the state adequately funded and supported it, was to find, monitor, and protect biodiversity. The creation of Natural Area Preserves, he said, would help accomplish that largely abandoned mission.

“While identifying rare species is important, without a means to protect them, there is no guaranteeing their survival,” Cornell said. “Natural Area Preserves would protect our rarest ecosystems, including old-growth forests.”

The nonprofit Cornell co-founded aims to locate, document, and advocate for the preservation of all remaining old-growth trees and forests in Rhode Island.

The organization’s work could help the Ocean State address biodiversity loss and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. A report published in September confirmed the “outsized role” the country’s older forests play in storing carbon while also supporting high levels of biodiversity.

Using processed satellite images to identify structural measures related to forest maturity, scientists found that older forests make up nearly 170 million acres (36%) of all forests in the contiguous United States. While older forests in National parks are fully protected, only 24% of National forests and Bureau of Land Management lands that contain older forests have similar protections.

The study identified 50 million acres of older federal forests as at-risk from logging, which, if cut down, would emit the equivalent of 9% of U.S. annual greenhouse gases.

A Natural Area Preserve system, Cornell said, would promote research and protect “interesting ecosystems.”

Anyone interested in joining the Rhode Island Old Growth Tree Society, can contact Cornell at ncornell.ogts@gmail.com.

Categories

Join the Discussion

View Comments

Recent Comments

  1. Excellent work by Nathan Cornell and the Old Growth Tree Society. Encouraged to hear that D.E.M. was so receptive to the information. Here’s hoping!

  2. “Cornell said the Survey found a list of areas from the 1990s that were under consideration to be designated as Natural Area Preserves, including 21 locations in Gloucester, 16 in West Greenwich, 14 in Foster, 10 in Coventry, and six in Cumberland. He said some of the locations on that list have since been developed.”

    The list Nathan was given by the Survey was not from the 90s, it was from 1971 and is the unofficial list of Rhode Island natural areas that was prepared as part of the New England Natural Areas Program coordinated by Mass Audubon. The Rhode Island list was facilitated by the Audubon Society of RI, and prepared by George Seavey who spent countless hours in the field with local experts documenting the state’s natural areas. He was fortunate enough to document some just before they were developed. But, this list also served as a crucial document when the Natural Heritage Program began documenting the state’s biodiversity in 1979.

    The Natural Areas Protection Act of 1993 was enacted as an initiative of The Nature Conservancy, their objective being to facilitat the designation of natural areas on State lands to ensure proper management of the designated area. Although nine areas on state lands were proposed for designation by the DEM Director, it’s safe to say that no DEM Director since 1995 has shown much interest in “tying the hands of his/her resource managers with restrictive management plans,” or something like that.

    Since passage of the Act in 1993, The Nature Conservancy has shown little interest in influencing the DEM Director, or in seeking natural area status for their own properties. The combined disinterest of DEM and TNC for the last 25+ years is why everyone has forgotten.

    And, in case you missed it:
    “Cornell noted that the key aspect of the Natural Heritage Program, when the state adequately funded and supported it, was to find, monitor, and protect biodiversity. The creation of Natural Area Preserves, he said, would help accomplish that largely abandoned mission.” Amen.

  3. I think our Department of Environmental Management is misnamed . Based on their record of not protecting our environmental resources it should be renamed the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Mismanagement.
    Despite the many dedicated and hard working people at this department they seem to come down on the side of polluters and developers in far to many instances.
    This has to change the people of Rhode Island deserve a strong advocate for the preservation and restoration of our natural resources not the seemingly carte blanche that developers seem to have with them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your support keeps our reporters on the environmental beat.

Reader support is at the core of our nonprofit news model. Together, we can keep the environment in the headlines.

cookie

We use cookies to improve your experience and deliver personalized content. View Cookie Settings