Transit Supporters Speak Up for Increased RIPTA Funding


The Rhode Island Public Transit Authority’s fleet of buses transports some 16 million riders annually. (RIPTA)

PROVIDENCE — Advocates continued their push for increased funding for the Rhode Island Public Transit Authority during a House Finance Subcommittee on Environment and Transportation hearing last week.

More than a dozen transit supporters from different advocacy groups, including RI Transit Riders, Young Voices, and the Providence Streets Coalition, spoke at the nearly 4-hour hearing on funding RIPTA and the state Department of Transportation for the next fiscal year.

The advocates raised concerns over a looming fiscal cliff the agency faces in 2025, when the federal COVID funding that has sustained RIPTA through the pandemic dries up, and the need to fund the state’s Transit Master Plan.

Before hearing testimony, the audience listened to a presentation on the proposed RIPTA budget, which meets some of the agency’s requests for the next year but does not address the future depletion of federal funding.

“The pandemic has been hard on RIPTA, as it has been on most transit agencies,” said RIPTA chief financial officer Chris Durand, emphasizing the need for future funding in addition to money to electrify RIPTA buses and follow through with plans to improve service.

At a RIPTA board meeting earlier this month, staff put forward a resolution calling on the General Assembly and the governor to fully fund the agency so that it can avoid the cliff and also improve service and make transit greener.

The resolution was tabled, but a new draft is expected to be presented and voted on at the next meeting, scheduled for April 12.

Barry Schiller, a former Transportation Advisory Committee member and transit advocate, testified that underinvestment will lead to a negative feedback loop and deterioration of the agency.

“Without more service, we’re not going to get a lot more riders,” said Schiller, suggesting that free service and an attitude shift is needed to encourage more transit riding.

Fares account for little of the agency’s revenue. Most of RIPTA’s funding is covered by state and federal subsidies, including money from the state’s gas tax.

Liza Burkin, the lead organizer for the Providence Streets Coalition, said the tax isn’t an adequate funding mechanism, reading a snippet of a Johnston Sunrise article from 2011 which described how officials had hoped to turn to other funding sources more than a decade ago.

Burkin suggested the Legislature look at the list of potential funding sources within the Transit Master Plan for alternatives.

Other RIPTA riders talked about the value they already see in the system and their desire to maintain and grow it.

Amber Ma, a rider who went “car-free” last August, said she frequently uses public transit and has been pleased with the quality of the service.

“Since August, I can count on one hand the number of times I’ve had to rely on car-sharing just because it has been so convenient for us,” she said. “I want to see my tax dollars going toward more forward thinking on transit options for Rhode Island, and that includes fully funding RIPTA and other important initiatives in the transit master plan.”

One of the youngest witnesses, Cedric Ye, described how RIPTA allows him to get around with independence as a person younger than 16 and argued for the need to better support the system.

“Rhode Island’s underfunding of transit just appalls me,” said Ye, describing the state’s low per capita spending on transit compared to other New England states. “This is absolutely absurd and outrageous.”

“Continuing to show indifference to this issue will show the transit dependent communities, climate supporters, and tens of thousands of transit riders that our needs don’t matter, and our glaring inequality … lost opportunity, and environmental crisis is acceptable,” he said. “When my generation reaches voting age, we will remember what you do today.”

His comments were met with snaps and cheering from the audience.

A second hearing on the appropriations bill, H5200, has not yet been scheduled.


Join the Discussion

View Comments

Recent Comments

  1. I have been using RIPTA since the 1970s. Same problems and issues exist now that existed then and all times in between. It should be named ProvPTA as that’s the only area they cover effectively. Now, I go from East Providence the URI and back for work. Going not so bad most days, but coming home? Anywhere from 1-1/2 hours to 4 or more. Caught is highway traffic. Buses in Prov never show or are late, late, late. Bus shelters that don’t shelter you from anything.

    I take the bus because I want to support public transportation, but I won’t take it in the winter because it’s just too much crap to deal with.

  2. Public transportation should be affordable accessible convenient and reliable. For many people it is none of these.
    Public transportation in this state has to become a part of the 21st century not outdated and archaic.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your support keeps our reporters on the environmental beat.

Reader support is at the core of our nonprofit news model. Together, we can keep the environment in the headlines.


We use cookies to improve your experience and deliver personalized content. View Cookie Settings