Supporters Want E-Bikes Allowed on R.I.’s Bicycle Paths


Legislators were given the chance to ride an electric bike around the lower Statehouse parking lot last Thursday. Bike advocates and electric bike companies are intent on dispelling the idea that e-bikes are unsafe. (Rob Smith/ecoRI News)

PROVIDENCE — Cycling advocates and business owners got their chance to wheel and deal with legislators last week.

On May 4, the Rhode Island Bicycle Coalition (RIBC), with representatives from local bike shops, hosted a demonstration on the lower Statehouse parking lot to show elected officials all about electric bicycles, or e-bikes, and give them a chance to ride one.

RIBC president Kathleen Gannon told ecoRI News the event was aimed at dispelling some of the misinformation or presumptions people have about e-bikes.

“People don’t often understand what e-bikes are,” Gannon said. “Today they can get a chance to look at them and try them.”

E-bikes are bicycles that come equipped with an electric motor — although, noted Gannon, they aren’t actually motors like those powered by gas — that help propel the bike when riding. The e-bike industry, following the lead of the U.S. Department of Transportation, classifies them into three distinct classes based on how the motor assists the rider and the maximum speed a bike can go.

Class 1 e-bikes have pedal-assist, which means the engine only helps propel the rider while pedaling, and the function stops when the bike reaches a maximum speed of 20 mph.

Class 2 e-bikes come with throttle-assistance. Similar to motorcycles, the electric motor is activated by twisting a throttle on the handlebar. These bicycles are also capped at a maximum speed of 20 mph.

Class 3 e-bikes are similar to class 1, in that they rely on pedal-assistance to activate the electric motor’s assistance, but can reach a greater maximum speed of 28 mph.

E-bike batteries are located inside the bike, and on average have a range of 30-60 miles on a single charge, although a select few models come with the ability to mount a second external battery on the chassis to increase mileage.

Advocates say the electric motor is a game-changer for everyone, especially people who may have disabilities or medical conditions that prevent them from riding a traditional bicycle. The motor allows people to ride up hills they wouldn’t be able to normally under their own pedaling power, and to travel for longer distances.

In Rhode Island, e-bikes are technically illegal on bike paths as the state has no laws on the books regulating them, but their status isn’t usually enforced. Despite being considered bicycles, they are motorized vehicles in the state’s view. Rhode Island is an outlier; 40 states have passed the 3-class system as laid out by the federal government and e-bike industry.

Earlier this year Rep. Rebecca Kislak, D-Providence, introduced legislation (H5220) to regulate e-bikes according to the standards laid out by the U.S. Department of Transportation. It’s the second year in a row Kislak introduced such legislation.

During a February hearing, Kislak told members of the House Corporations Committee that she originally thought of e-bikes as “cheating” and did not understand the benefits they provide.

“I went for a ride with a friend who has a mobility impairment, and I couldn’t have gone on a bike ride with her without it,” Kislak said. “It was amazing.”

Not everyone shares that view. In written testimony, several East Bay residents expressed concern over allowing e-bikes on bike paths, citing an instance in 2022 when a Bristol man was struck by an e-bike user while riding his bicycle on the East Bay Bike Path.

“Trying to make motorized bikes equivalent to human powered bicycles on bike paths is a recipe for disaster,” wrote Bristol resident Judy Brynes in testimony to the committee.

Gannon disputes the safety concerns some people have about e-bikes, noting maximum speed limits prevent them from being less safe than traditional bicycles, which can exceed 20 mph downhill. Gannon said most people probably couldn’t tell the difference between an e-bike and a traditional bicycle without examining it up close.

“That’s just what these are,” she said. “They’re bicycles.”


Join the Discussion

View Comments

Recent Comments

  1. As someone who uses the bike paths regularly for jogging and bike riding with my young children, I find the use of E-bikes (aka. E-mopeds) on our recreation paths/bike paths to be irresponsible. These vehicles are mo-peds / motorcycles. They belong on transportation through-ways designated for higher speed transportation vehicles. We can all collectively agree that the “modified” or higher speed mo-peds should not be allowed on these recreation paths. Who is going to police which e-bikes are which? What will the punishment be if they are driving the wrong E-moped on our bike paths? Just outlaw them all together on our recreation paths and be done with it. Follow the money on this. We dont allow combustion engine transportation vehicles on our recreation paths – why would an electric engine transportation vehicle be any different? Safety should guide decision making on this. How is this even a debate?! Why do we require training and licenses for mo-ped, car and motorcycle drivers? Safety.

  2. I ride on the Coventry trail with a manual bike and I have no issues with the electric bike riders around me. However, this change has actually brought very loud fuel loaded mini bikes onto this trail which nearly caused me to lose my balance and fall. So we need to enforce in detail what kind if bikes are allowed and not allowed here.

  3. Legalizing EMBs (electric motorized bicycles) on RI bike paths will endanger the vulnerable users who have been enjoying the bike paths for over 30 years. This bill is being pushed by an industry coalition called People for Bikes as there is so much money to be made by cashing in our bike paths.
    When the demo was held at the State House, (a possible impropriety in itself), the bikes presented bore little resemblance to the 70+ pound EMB bikes that are so heavy they need hydraulic disc brakes to stop them. This is what is now on the bike paths-heavy EMBs with motorcycle size tires that can go 30+ mph.
    Why mix them in with vulnerable users like walkers and kids? As for energy savings, they are being operated on bike paths, not only as a substitute for cars, but much of the time they are replacing human powered bikes. How is this contributing to energy efficiency? There is also nothing in this bill about lithium battery safety or recycling, and nothing at all about enforcement. In fact local municipalities would be prohibited from enacting any restrictions although in reality, they are the ones who are the first responders. There is also no input in this bill from DEM or DOT as the prime stakeholders-the State Bike Path system is actually an administrative orphan in the state, even though bike paths, as linear parks, are part of the state park system.
    This is a flawed bill which creates yet another unfunded mandate, as apparently DEM has no resources to ensure safety on the bike paths. Since that is the reality, why make it worse? The bill passed the House, has been heard in the Senate Judiciary Committee and is held for further study.
    PS the e bike operator who crashed into the pedal bike rider gave the Warren Police a false name, address and phone number and has never been identified.
    Judith A. Byrnes (note spelling)
    Bristol, along the East Bay Bike Path

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your support keeps our reporters on the environmental beat.

Reader support is at the core of our nonprofit news model. Together, we can keep the environment in the headlines.


We use cookies to improve your experience and deliver personalized content. View Cookie Settings