State Planning Council Approves New Transportation Improvement Plan Draft, with Bulk of Funding Going to RIDOT
'Greenhouse gas' is not mentioned once in the draft plan, nor is the Act on Climate.
September 12, 2025
Rhode Island has a new road map for its transportation priorities after the State Planning Council approved Thursday the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) 2026-2035.
The federal government mandates that each state create a STIP to outline its transportation projects over a 5- to 10-year period. If a project isn’t included in the document, it can’t receive part of an estimated $10 billion in federal funding from the U.S. Department of Transportation.
The Rhode Island Division of Statewide Planning, the Department of Transportation, and the Rhode Island Public Transit Authority all drafted the document with input from public comments and hearings.
The STIP outlines priorities for the state, including maintaining roads and bridges, better connecting the state through transportation, promoting environmental sustainability, and encouraging economic growth. It currently budgets more than two-thirds of its spending on roads and bridges. Bicycle, pedestrian, and transit projects represent 12% of the funding.
“Highways remain the primary mode of travel in Rhode Island,” according to the report. “Highway projects receive the greatest share of STIP resources, with the focus on state of good repair and system preservation.”
By department, that means that 86% of the funding that STIP outlines would go to RIDOT, 14% for RIPTA, and 1% each to the Rhode Island Toll Bridge Authority and community-led projects.
Within the hundreds of public comments submitted ahead of the draft’s approval, many took issue with the level of funding planned for car-centric transportation over public transit, biking, and walking, especially in light of Rhode Island’s upcoming climate mandates.
State Attorney General Peter Neronha, who will be charged with defending the state against claims made under the Act on Climate law, wrote a letter saying that the STIP doesn’t adequately address transportation-related emissions.
Under the 2021 law, the state is required to get its emissions 45% below 1990 levels by 2030, and enforcement of the law can begin as early as next year. As written, the act allows citizens or organizations that believe the state is violating the law to file suit in court starting in 2026.
The STIP “fails to take a forward-looking approach to achieving the state’s long-term goals, and falls far short of meaningfully furthering compliance on the Act on Climate,” Neronha wrote. He suggested that more funding opportunities for RIPTA and non-car forms of transportation need to be added to the STIP to help Rhode Island meet its emission mandates.
In comparison, the Massachusetts draft STIP includes two sections on greenhouse gas analysis, per its own climate mandates.
“Greenhouse gas” is not mentioned once in Rhode Island’s draft, nor is the Act on Climate.
Scott Wolf, executive director of the anti-sprawl organization Grow Smart Rhode Island and a member of the State Planning Council, voiced his own concerns about the lack of public transportation funding at the Thursday meeting.
“Could we consider passing this STIP with an amendment to the effect of, if there’s additional federal funding, that we prioritize doubling the amount over time, toward bike, [pedestrian], and transit?” Wolf asked.
The proposed amendment wasn’t added to the STIP, but instead, members voted to attach the minutes from the meeting, which noted these concerns, and send them to the governor’s office.
Several members also noted that after the STIP is passed, it can still be changed. The state must meet a Sept. 30 deadline to send the plan to the Federal Highway Administration for final approval.
Wolf was the only member to vote against the plan.
“If I thought that my vote is going to sink the state’s efforts to get any federal funding after Oct. 1, or transportation writ large, I would vote for the STIP,” he said, “but I think it’s important that somebody on this council, especially somebody who doesn’t have constraints that other people have, speak out about some of the what we perceive as inadequacies of a plan that’s got a lot of good elements.”
Categories
Join the Discussion
View CommentsRecent Comments
Leave a Reply
Your support keeps our reporters on the environmental beat.
Reader support is at the core of our nonprofit news model. Together, we can keep the environment in the headlines.
The DOT is riun by an incompetent fool who shoild be fired. i hope AG Neronha sues the State planning council for dereliction of duty.
the plan has always had a lot of good projects, the problem is that the current administration and its RIDOT Director implements almost none of them, instead ever more expensive expressway capacity expansions
(on routes 95, 195, 295, 4, 37, 146 and the 6-10) that encourage more driving more sprawl, mire emissions, more public health problems from the drive-everywhere culture, and more of our energy dollars to flow to our of state oil interests. We can hope the next administration will change thus
Sen Sam Zurier sent out a letter to his constituent with a great analysis of how RIPTA could be better funded and RIDOT not be underfunded. He also thought RIDOT should have to come up with an explanation of their spending rtc as requested of RIPTA. Nerhona right on target as usual.
Well I hope we’re all ready for some lawsuits!