Solar Program Designed to Help Low-Income and Environmental Justice Zone Residents Instead Leaves them Stranded
December 18, 2025
PROVIDENCE — The program was supposed to put solar panels on roofs and help Rhode Island’s low-income families with their electric bills. Instead, it left homeowners dealing with a bankrupt company and nowhere to turn for help.
Nearly two years ago, Gov. Dan McKee announced the Affordable Solar Access Pathways (ASAP) program. The idea behind it was simple: provide cash incentives for homeowners in low-income and environmental justice zones to install solar panels on the roofs of their homes.
The state, using money from the Renewable Energy Fund, would give incentives to a vendor to provide solar panels, leases and power-purchase agreements to qualifying homeowners. Leases would be signed for 25 years. The state would also provide energy efficiency measures and a home energy audit to the homeowners, at no cost to them, as part of the program.
The idea behind the initiative was to spur solar panel adoption among low-income homeowners and lower their energy costs. Areas of Woonsocket, Central Falls, Pawtucket, Providence, Cranston, West Warwick, East Providence, Warren, Middletown, and Newport would be eligible to apply.
The only other requirement for households was to have a roof in good condition and have an income at or below 80% of the state median. There was no credit score required, and homeowners in default electric service could apply. The program, as designed, was guaranteed to provide savings for homeowners in the first year.
“Low-to-moderate income communities have been historically underserved in the solar marketplace and often experience the negative impacts of climate change firsthand,” McKee said in a January 2024 press release announcing the launch of the program. “Providing environmental justice communities with affordable access to rooftop solar is essential to ensure all Rhode Islanders benefit from the renewable energy transition.”
The state hired PosiGen, a Saint Rose, La.-based company, to administer the program, which was similar to the service PosiGen provided, except the state would subsidize a big chunk of the leases for enrollees in the program.
PosiGen ultimately owned the solar panels and the leases, and households in the program were actually paying back the company, not the state. That’s how its business model worked: the company installed the solar panels at no cost, recouping costs entirely via the lease payments.
The $1 million in incentives from the Renewable Energy Fund would provide between 200 and 300 homes with solar panels, according to the program launch’s press release.
By August 2024, 116 households had signed contracts with PosiGen, with the state estimating the first year of energy savings to be $830 in electrical costs. The effective price of the energy was 13 cents per kilowatt-hour, according to the program metrics recorded by the state Office of Energy Resources (OER) — the last resort service rates last winter and this winter were 16.39 cents and 14.77 cents per kilowatt-hour respectively.
The program was, by all measures, succeeding. It was putting solar panels on the roofs of low-income homeowners in environmental justice zones — areas determined by the state to suffer adverse environmental and public health consequences usually caused by pollution — and lowering their winter electricity costs. But developments with PosiGen in recent months have put the program, and its enrollees, in uncertain waters.
Last month PosiGen filed for bankruptcy, and it’s not clear what will happen to the Rhode Islanders who signed contracts in the solar program. State officials aren’t saying much.
“It’s too soon to determine,” said Matthew Touchette, director of communications for the state Executive Office of Commerce. Touchette declined to provide ecoRI News with a copy of the PosiGen contract, saying a request for the document must go through open records request procedures.
We’re concerned about PosiGen going out of business. We continue to meet with the PosiGen team on a bi-weekly basis to ensure there is a pathway for existing customers to either cancel their contracts or move forward with a channel partner that PosiGen will identify soon.”
— Robert Beadle, chief public affairs officer for OER
Beadle said both state agencies are committed to offering a low-income solar program, but had not made a decision on either finding a new vendor or pursuing a different program. The existing program still has one thing left: money. Touchette told ecoRI News the ASAP program still had most of its funding; $842,199 was left when the program was paused.
On Aug. 24, PosiGen laid off nearly its entire staff. The company at that point had furnished solar power for some 40,000 residential customers across 15 states.
Solar Power World, a solar industry trade publication, reported that thanks to the Trump administration’s “Big Beautiful Bill” clawing back tax credits related to renewable energy, the company had failed to make interest payments on some of its debt, and the company’s investors declined to put more money into the company.
With not enough cash left in the bank to cover its operating expenses, PosiGen moved to lay off most of its staff instead, many of whom were caught unaware. OER and Rhode Island Commerce paused applications for the ASAP program shortly after, and have yet to find a new vendor to run the program.
On the state’s ASAP webpage, consumers are told to contact the company: “If you are a current ASAP participant with questions about your project or billing, please contact PosiGen customer service at 888-939-4442.”
The company remained in something of a holding pattern until last month. Reuters reported the company filed for Chapter 11 protections in Texas in November, and the company has been working its way through bankruptcy court. The company has $206 million in funded debt and its primary lender, Brookfield Asset Management, wants to foreclose on its assets and transfer the customers to a new solar power provider.
Part of PosiGen’s problems was its core business model. PosiGen provided solar panels at no cost to the consumer, instead of recouping expenses through the 25-year leases, as well as selling tax credits and the revenue from the leases to investors.
The second coming of the Trump administration was an existential crisis for PosiGen and the larger renewable energy industry in the United States. Trump’s hostility to renewables has been well documented. And when Congress passed the “Big Beautiful Bill” this past summer, it sunset or slashed dozens of tax credits used by the industry, which has as a result sharply reduced its expectations for expansion in the coming years.
If you or someone you know has purchased solar panels from or been affected by the bankruptcy of PosiGen, please contact reporter Rob Smith at [email protected].
Not surprising. These renewable subsidies are not useful when run by RI. Let the market do this stuff, not a corrupt and incompetent government. If we want lower and reliable utility costs, open up the gas pipelines that Biden closed off.
The criminality of the Trump administration and the stupidity of people like Ben Riggs means that people will die. Gas will kill millions of people.
OMG this has been one of my recurring concerns. All these johnnie-come-lately companies selling solar panels across RI raised my cynicism. just for shits and giggles i had a representative of a roof solar panel company come and speak with me. he was a 20 something kid that didn t know squat about the details and wanted me to take out an $80k loan to amortize the cost of the excessive amount of panels they proposed to install on my roof. half of which were on the north side of a 12 pitch roof. these panels have a shelf life. i don t know what it is, but who do you call when all these fly-by-nighters are long gone. most people i speak to tell me that their solar panel system has a 7 year pay back period. really, what then? will the panels ever last that long, who s going to do the maintenance if there is a problem? how about all the holes they drill in the roof to install the racking system for the panels? i think that the secret sauce for the solar panel companies is the combination of the subsidies and the mortgages that the solar panel companies want the homeowners to subscribe to. it has nothing to do with the fact that they are selling renewable energy. i m also thoroughly unimpressed with the BS that these companies vomit. the kid that met with me said the program was a “tariff program”. meaning that he wanted me to take out a thirty year mortgage to pay for the panels, the monthly mortgage cost i could pay for with the savings on my electric bill. WHAT!? why the hell would i do that?
BTY Mr. Riggs i m offended by your knee jerk comment about “a corrupt and incompetent government”. yes government has its inefficiencies and frustrations but spare me the “waste, corruption and abuse” comment from every republican about government.
you re full of it.
Thanks, Mr. Pastore, for your example of the incompetence part. On corruption, from AI: “Rhode Island has a long, well-documented history of political corruption, earning nicknames like the “Corruption Capital,” with numerous high-profile convictions of mayors, state legislators, and even a governor (Buddy Cianci, Gordon Fox, Ed DiPrete), often involving bribery, extortion, and misuse of funds…”. And the Washington Post named RI as in the top six corrupt states in 2021.
BTW, I’m not a Republican. Happy holidays.
AI Overview
President Donald Trump has repeatedly called wind and solar energy “the scam of the century,” blaming them for rising energy costs, halting federal support, and canceling projects, while advocating for fossil fuels, despite critics arguing his claims lack scientific backing and harm clean energy efforts. He’s targeted offshore wind, calling it “ugly” and “disgusting,” and cut funding for projects, pushing an “energy dominance” agenda focused on oil, gas, and nuclear power instead. SO TRUE!!!
China uses Uyghur forced labour to make solar panels, says report CCP CHINA makes ~~ 90% of Solar Panels which usa imports. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-57124636 The BBC is Fake News but sometimes gets it right.
Many Americans never stopped believing in the benefits of slavery to them. They just don’t want it in their back yard. The same goes for pollution in manufacturing. So have the Chinese do this stuff; slavery, forced labor, and massive use of coal plants. Isn’t something wrong with this picture?
Ben Riggs makes some points worth thinking about, but doesn’t offer an alternative solution. His only suggestion is to let the market take over. The priority of business is (rightfully) to make money. It isn’t concerned with the future. Oil and gas companies want to extract as much wealth as possible from the resources we have left. Even if you refute that fossil fuel emissions affect the climate it has to be apparent that the earth will run out of oil, gas etc. eventually and there must be a substitute in place when that happens. As flawed as it is, it is the government, not business that has to implement this.