Government

Legislation Proposes All New Cars Sold in Rhode Island by 2030 be Electric

Share

The bill would require all new cars sold or leased in Rhode Island by 2030 to be electric. (istock)

PROVIDENCE — If you want to buy a car in 10 years, your only local option could be to electric.

Under legislation (S2448) introduced by Sen. Alana DiMario, D-North Kingstown, all new cars sold or leased in Rhode Island by 2030 would have to be electric vehicles. The bill also establishes a framework to determine the infrastructure needed to charge electric vehicles and creates an environmental-justice board.

“We know this transition needs to happen and we need a strategy and a plan to get there,” DiMario said. “By 2030, every Rhode Islander buying a new car should be able to go electric without worrying where they are going to charge.”

It’s the way the manufacturers are moving, according to Mal Skowron, transportation and policy coordinator for the Green Energy Consumers Alliance.

“Honda, General Motors, and Volvo are planning on not selling gas-powered cars within the next 20 years,” she said. “It’s not a matter of if electric vehicles are coming to Rhode Island, do drivers want these cars. It’s a matter of how quickly they’re going to come, and how we can use these electric vehicles to meet our climate goals.”

Rhode Island is in desperate need of programs to tackle transportation-sector emissions. Vehicles are the biggest emitter of greenhouse gases (GHG) in Rhode Island, accounting for 35% of all emissions in the state according to the latest emissions inventory from the Department of Environmental Management (DEM).

And statewide emissions are going up. DEM reported earlier this year that overall GHG emissions increased 8.2% in 2018 per its latest data, putting Rhode Island emissions 1.8% percent higher than they were in 1990.

The data show Rhode Island is currently failing the first benchmark mandate — 10% percent lower than 1990 climate emissions — established by the Act on Climate last year. State reporting also has the added knife twist of a three-year delay, meaning Rhode Island officials and the public won’t find out about the likely 2020 failure until 2023 at the earliest, far too late to change course.

Rhode Island was a key member of the Transportation & Climate Initiative — a regional cap-and-invest program that would have reduced transportation-sector emissions while raising much-needed money for green energy projects — and the last member left at the local altar when neighboring states Massachusetts and Connecticut declined to codify the program into law, citing soaring gas prices.

Rhode Island now has no plan to reduce transportation-sector emissions.

Brian Moran, director of Government Affairs for the New England Convenience Store and Energy Marketers Association, told legislators last week the lobbying group favored voluntary incentives for fleet electrification and consumer adoption.

“Mandates I imagine are a little unrealistic right now,” Moran testified. “Rhode Island has the worst EV adoption rates in the country. It’s a nascent, embryonic industry right now.”

Moran also took aim at DiMario’s companion legislation to make new medium and heavy-duty vehicles have net-zero emissions by 2050.

“For heavy duty trucks, it’s still proof of concept,” he said. “We’re concerned about the interstate and the inflationary pressure this bill could do. Everything in this room is transported by a truck.”

But the future is a lot closer than proof of concept. The Rhode Island Public Transit Authority (RIPTA) recently concluded a pilot program, spending $2.5 million to lease three electric buses to run the R-Line, a bus line spanning Washington Park to Pawtucket. According to The Providence Journal, the pilot program had mixed results, with each bus battery charge only lasting about 100 miles in the cold, as opposed to the 300-mile range per charge as originally advertised.

RIPTA has ordered 14 new electric buses to replace aging diesel ones, with an expected delivery date of later this year. The agency also announced it will install on-route chargers to compensate for the lack of battery life in its electric fleet.

Heavy-duty trucks — vehicles that weigh more than 8,500 pounds — are on the way. Last week Swedish startup Volta Trucks announced it would deploy 100 of its Class 7 trucks to Los Angeles next year. These electric heavy-duty trucks have a range of 95-125 miles per charge, and are designed for urban logistics not long hauls across the American countryside.

Meanwhile, Rhode Island has let heavy-duty vehicle emissions remain unchecked for 20-plus years, after passing legislation to crack down on them. As ecoRI News reported last year, the state’s heavy-duty vehicle emissions program remains in development, 18 years after it was supposed to be implemented.

Heavy-duty vehicles represent 5% of the nation’s traffic, but account for 20% of all transportation emissions.

Categories

Join the Discussion

View Comments

Recent Comments

  1. I am a strong proponent of electric vehicles, but there are issues which will need to be addressed:
    #1. Cost of electric vehicles is very high. Many of us simply cannot afford them, and not only “low Income” people.
    #2. There are almost no public charging stations in the state or elsewhere. What will a Rhode Island driver do if they travel 200 miles from home and need to charge up?
    #3. Every car owner will need a charging station at home. What about renters? Will we require landlords to install them?
    #3. If every car becomes electric there is likely to be a 25% increase in electricity usage which the current grid can neither support nor deliver.
    All of these things can be resolved over time, but not in eight years. Right now, anyone purchasing an electric vehicle is aware of the limitations and will modify their driving habits to accommodate them. If we mandate the purchase of electric vehicles it will come with the expectation that they will be as convenient to own and drive as any car is today.

  2. The convenience store owners are full of it. They complain about everything. Obstruct and Delay is the only song they know. What they are doing is trying to kill us all with heat waves. If GM can commit to going 100% electric, it should be very easy for convenience store owners to do the same. Their opposition shows that they are criminals.

  3. I have to agree. They need to get the price of electricity way down. If we only have electricity we no longer have competition
    to why a price would every drop. That worries me.
    Giving tax breaks for EV sounds good but is it really? We are still paying for it though other taxes.
    I believe the approach should be though competition. Not everyone believes the world will come to an end
    if it takes another 30-50 years to sort out how a Power Company can produce power cheaper than it can now with oil/coal.
    It takes an awefull lot of solar panel farms to produce the same power a Power Company Generator can produce
    and were going to need a lot, a really lot of electric power then we have now.
    I hope things slow down and takes smart cautious steps to avoid the pain we are dealing with Energy now.
    Its bad enough RI wants to force people to switch to heat pumps. To much change to quickly to be dangerous.

  4. I believe in choice.
    The average household has 2.5 vehicles. The type 2 charging system draws more amperage than a central AC unit.
    New England uses heating oil which they want to go electric as well.
    Supply and Demand will cause electricity prices to skyrocket.
    Do we install more solar and windmill farms?? This would take more of our forest, farmlands and ocean footprint.
    Hurricanes, Nor-Eastern’s, blizzards, ice storms cause power outages every year in the New England area.
    Farmers have farm equipment that are 20-25 years old that they maintain themselves at little cost to them. What will they be required to do.
    So many concerns.
    Choice. If someone can afford the EV and the charging system. And in ever how many years purchasing a new lithium ion battery. Go for it. But it should not be mandated for every American citizen.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Your support keeps our reporters on the environmental beat.

Reader support is at the core of our nonprofit news model. Together, we can keep the environment in the headlines.

cookie

We use cookies to improve your experience and deliver personalized content. View Cookie Settings