R.I. has No Plan to Reduce Transportation Emissions

Act on Climate mandates nearly impossible to meet without addressing transportation sector


The transportation sector accounts for nearly 40 percent of Rhode Island's greenhouse gas emissions. (istock)

PROVIDENCE — Rhode Island lawmakers are going into the new legislative session with no clear plan to reduce transportation-sector emissions, after neighboring states pulled out of the regional Transportation & Climate Initiative (TCI) late last year.

Rep. Terri Cortvriend, D-Portsmouth, confirmed last week she would not be reintroducing the Transportation Emissions and Mobile (TEAM) Community Act this session or any alternative legislation to tackle vehicle emissions.

“We’re hoping to come up with an alternative,” she said.

Cortvriend introduced the TEAM Act with Sen. Alana DiMario, D-North Kingstown, last year. The bill passed the Senate but stalled in the House Finance Committee. The legislation would have raised $20 million annually for cleaner transit projects, with 35 percent of all funds dedicated toward communities hit hardest by transportation emissions.

The bill was intended to complement the Act on Climate legislation and provide a mechanism for reaching the law’s ambitious goals. Rhode Island has a benchmark goal of reducing statewide climate emissions to 45 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. Transportation-sector emissions account for 36 percent of the state’s total greenhouse gas emissions. TCI advocates estimate the compact could reduce those emissions by 26 percent across the region.

But TCI requires at least three participating jurisdictions, a feat that became impossible last fall after the governors of Connecticut and Massachusetts announced their states no longer supported the program, citing either uncooperative legislatures or rising gasoline prices.

The program as proposed requires fuel suppliers to buy allowances for the carbon produced by their products, which was expected to raise about $3 billion over the next 10 years for participating governments.

With no similar legislation expected during the 2022 General Assembly session, the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management is expected to take a lead role in reducing transportation-sector emissions. Acting agency director Terry Gray has pledged to analyze the federal infrastructure bill for funds to reduce emissions.

“We will have serious difficulty meeting the new law’s reduction mandates without a strong commitment and plan to reduce emissions from the transportation sector,” Gray said in November.

State legislators aren’t deterred.

“We are optimistic it will come back around again after the election, if we are fortunate to win re-election,” Cortvriend said. “We hope the landscape changes because so many people put so much time into that.”

The 2022 General Assembly session is scheduled to begin Jan. 4.


Join the Discussion

View Comments

Recent Comments

  1. The governor and Rep Shekarchi are shirking their duties and violating the law. The need to get on the stick and get something done NOW to reduce transportation pollution

  2. James Celenza:-A remaining muti-state project has been in the works and still may have traction is the Northeast Corridor Commission (NEC). The NEC includes Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland the District of Columbia; as well as the federal government, eight commuter rail agencies, and Amtrak to develop high speed and capacity on existing infrastructure shared by commuter rail and Amtrak, while also advancing the planning and development of new rail segments between New Haven, CT – Providence, RI and Maryland – Delaware. The NEC released CONNECT NEC 2035 this summer—a sweeping 15-year ambitious reinvestment program and a new way of planning: a multi-agency, multi-year, shared action plan guided by a long-term vision. The C35 will be updated in two years. CONNECT NEC 2035 can be a mobilizing force to sustain investment in current and future rail networks to deliver reduced auto congestion and emissions, improve healthier mobility choices, create jobs, increase housing construction and address the growing threat of climate change in the transportation sector.

  3. not surprised politicians bailed on the TCI – with the runup of gas prices already, any measure that would raise then further was understandably regarded as political poison.
    , And I’m not suprised there is no backup – the TCI, which promised to "cap" transport emissions so they would somehow go away – poof – kept any serious discussion about what to actually do at bay so that in the meantime it was business as usual – mostly vast expenditures on fixing and expanding highways, digging us deeper in the climate hole. But there are other ways to go if only the state leadership really got interested

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your support keeps our reporters on the environmental beat.

Reader support is at the core of our nonprofit news model. Together, we can keep the environment in the headlines.


We use cookies to improve your experience and deliver personalized content. View Cookie Settings