Public Health & Recreation

Battle Over Westerly Beach Access Rages On Before CRMC

Share

Access to Weekapaug Beach in Westerly, R.I., is guarded by a security officer from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. during the summer. The Weekapaug Fire District, at least according to a group of concerned residents, is also illegally blocking a shoreline right of way known as the Spring Avenue Extension. (Frank Carini/ecoRI News)

WESTERLY, R.I. — Observers hoping for a quick resolution to the Spring Avenue Extension coastal access point are sure to be disappointed.

The Coastal Resources Management Council’s right of way (ROW) subcommittee opened its first evidentiary hearing Nov. 4. It’s the first chance both sides have had to produce evidence that proves or disproves if the ROW is truly open to the public.

Environmental news you can't miss
Get the latest ecoRI News stories in your inbox every Tuesday and Friday.
Environmental news you can't miss
Get the latest ecoRI News stories in your inbox every Tuesday and Friday.

For two and a half hours — with a single 15-minute break — the subcommittee heard testimony from witnesses, including title attorney Joseph Priestly, as attorneys representing the town of Westerly tried to prove to council members using decades-old plat maps the public status of the ROW.

“It’s a public highway open for access by the public and will remain so until abandoned by the town of Westerly,” Priestly testified. “Assuming that it has not been, it remains a public highway.”

Priestly added he had seen no evidence indicating the town had abandoned the ROW, either formally or informally, but noted he had not specifically looked for evidence of abandonment either. He also testified to subcommittee members that he saw no maintenance obligation by Westerly in the land evidence records.

A key point of evidence for supporters of the right of way is a 1939 plat map that has the ROW labeled. Westerly solicitor William Conley said for the ROW to be accepted under common law jurisprudence was a plat map depicting the ROW, and proof that it was open to the public historically, which would count as the town “accepting” the ROW without formally adopting it.

“By the late 1800s the Weekapaug Beach was a thriving beach community, there were hotels, it was a wonderful place to visit,” Conley said in his opening remarks. “But the only access for all those people from the trolley cars and hotels was the Spring Avenue right of way.”

But attorney Joseph Farside, representing the Weekapaug Fire District, which opposes labeling the Spring Avenue Extension as a public right of way, said in his opening remarks it was only one piece of evidence among many others that contradicted it, and said supporters of shoreline access were “trying to speak a right of way into existence.”

“It does not make all the ways on that plat public,” Farside said. “This is confirmed by two other roads shown on that plat map, Meadow and Shawmut, which remain private roads to this day as conceded by the town itself.”

Farside said the town never accepted Spring Avenue Extension as a right of way, even if it was dedicated. The ROW has been fenced off, undeveloped and untouched, said Farside, and a 1940 report from the Town Council shows it was not a public right of way. Aerial photos, said Farside, do not show a path over the Spring Avenue Extension, and rights to grant easements over the ROW to organizations like the Weekapaug Beach Company, a predecessor to the fire district, has never been a power held by the town.

“Proponents are guided by the blind hope that this subcommittee will sympathize with them, ignore their burden of proof and bend the public pressure to access what we call the beach, a piece of land owned by the fire district and its predecessor since at least 1884,” Farside said.

The legal tug-of-war over the Spring Avenue Extension ROW is nearly three years old. Members of CRMC’s ROW subcommittee accepted it as a contested case in early 2023, and over the past two and a half years the two sides in the case have been operating similarly to a lawsuit: making motions, filing depositions, entering discovery, and exchanging evidence.

It’s no surprise that once lawyers became involved, CRMC’s officials’ hopes of a quick and speedy resolution were dashed, and the evidentiary hearing indicated it would be a long process.

The subcommittee has already taken its first round of public testimony as to the right of way, at a packed meeting in Town Hall in September. CRMC executive director said at that meeting the agency was hoping to reach a final decision on the ROW within the next year.

Future subcommittee hearings for evidence are expected to be scheduled, with a second round of public input on the Spring Avenue Extension to follow after the hearings for the lawyers conclude.

Join the Discussion

View Comments

Recent Comments

  1. The Weekapaug Fire District’s predecessor-in-interest (former owner) promised public access over the right-of-way by the filing of several plat maps without specifically reserving the right-of-way from public use. Under a U.S. Supreme Court case City of Cincinnati v. Lessee of White (1832), the plat maps are promises of dedication that the fire district cannot withdraw now that the public has testified that it has used the way. The fire district cannot offer new evidence in contrary to the promise — which is what it is doing through elaborate arguments. These arguments are out of order and should be stopped by the CRMC.

  2. WFD is counting on the 1% 2nd home wealthy elite being about to gerrymander the shoreline. Not surprising but lifelong residents & local town councils from 1960s know this was always a public access.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your support keeps our reporters on the environmental beat.

Reader support is at the core of our nonprofit news model. Together, we can keep the environment in the headlines.

cookie
Español
Share
BLUESKY