Amtrak’s Role in Rail-Straightening Plan Questioned


The Federal Railroad Administration has proposed the straightening of Northeast Corridor tracks. (istock)

The Federal Railroad Administration has proposed the straightening of Northeast Corridor tracks, from Washington, D.C., to Boston. The new railroad path would cut off an estimated 45 minutes of travel time between New York City and Boston, but both public and private property in southern New England could be impacted, including some sensitive areas.

Politicians, the public, and various agencies and organizations have expressed concerns about the NEC Future proposal. With a final record of decision on the project expected as soon as this month, the Connecticut Trust for Historic Preservation, for one, has reached out to the National Passenger Rail Corporation (Amtrak) as the agency prepares to inherit the Federal Railroad Administration’s controversial plan to build new high-speed rail routes through coastal towns in Connecticut and Rhode Island.

The Connecticut Trust sent a letter to Amtrak that asked the agency to clarify and reconsider its role in the controversial plan. Since early 2016, when the public and legislators first became aware of the impacts of planned bypasses through southeastern Connecticut and Rhode Island, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) has faced withering opposition across a broad political spectrum. Project opposition has spread from Branford, Guilford and Fairfield County to Westerly and Charlestown, R.I.

“Eighty miles of new bypasses may be the Federal Railroad Administration’s dream for rail travel through Connecticut, but I fear this portion of the NEC Future plan will become Amtrak’s nightmare,” Daniel Mackay, executive director of the Connecticut Trust, wrote in the May 4 letter. “If the Record of Decision contains proposed bypasses from Old Saybrook to Kenyon, RI or in Fairfield County, Amtrak will be risking decades of opposition from Congressional leadership, communities, and potential customers in Connecticut and Rhode Island.”

An Amtrak spokesman and its director of business development attended a Jan. 10 meeting in Charlestown to discuss the proposed Old Saybrook to Kenyon Bypass. The public meeting gave the agency a preview of the anger that NEC Future has generated in southern New England, as more than 400 residents packed the cafeteria of a local school. Person after person voiced unanimous, and at times fiery, opposition to the plan.

“Amtrak officials took the blame for the plan when FRA officials wouldn’t attend,” said Gregory Stroud, director of special projects for the Connecticut Trust, who spoke at the January meeting.

Stroud also noted that Amtrak supported an alternative route, without either the bypasses or the planned expansion between Guilford and Branford, in its earlier comments on the draft proposal.

“This isn’t Amtrak’s preferred plan, but it is the one Amtrak and taxpayers will be stuck with for the next 40 years,” he said. “We’re hoping that Amtrak will advocate for removal of the bypasses.”


Join the Discussion

View Comments

Recent Comments

  1. First, this is a false worry, far secondary to the real problem that Trump has in effect proposed eliminating Amtrak. Though not immediately in the northeast corridor, his proposed elimination of the national network would hurt the corridor thru loss of passengers making connections, reduced economy of scale, and mot importantly, loss of Federal help from the politics of the bulk of states not getting any service. I cannot see the remotest chance the bypasses would be financed anytime in the foreseeable future, there is an enormous backlog of unfunded deferred maintenance on the corridor, not the least of which is at Penn Station, bridges in NJ, and tunnels under the Hudson and in Baltimore.
    Those concerned with the environment should be fighting a different battle, the battle to preserve intercity rail service, especially here where Amtrak service is electrified and our position on the corridor is an economic advantage. The environmental community is struggling to promote expensive EVs but neglecting Amtrak that is already electrified, or focusing on NIMBY opposition to track improvements.
    Those interested may want to come and discuss all this at the upcoming meeting of the RI Association of Railroad Passengers on Monday, May 15 at 7pm at the North Providence library, 1810 Mineral Spring Avenue. All are welcome.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your support keeps our reporters on the environmental beat.

Reader support is at the core of our nonprofit news model. Together, we can keep the environment in the headlines.


We use cookies to improve your experience and deliver personalized content. View Cookie Settings