Aquaculture & Fisheries

Quahog Study Commission Recommends Transplants, Monitoring

Share

Narragansett Bay quahog landings have been on the decline for the past 50 years. (istock)

PROVIDENCE — More transplants, more monitoring, and maybe even more nitrogen in Narragansett Bay.

Those are the main recommendations coming from a joint legislative study commission investigating the decline of quahog catches in the bay.

The commission, which has been meeting every month since September, concluded its work during a final meeting on April 30, when it approved a final report outlining its findings and recommendations on what to do about them.

The decline of the quahog in Narragansett Bay has been something of an ontological mystery for quahoggers and bay scientists during the past two decades. The number of quahogs caught wild in bay waters has been slowly declining for much of the 20th century, not counting a pair of peaks in the 1960s and ’80s.

According to data from the Department of Environmental Management, quahog landings have declined to levels between 400,000 and 1 million pounds a year since 2005, a dip similar to those seen in other New England states. The numbers are a far cry from the more than 4 million pounds of quahogs caught at the 1982 peak.

Among the recommendations the commission voted to approve: boosting the state’s quahog transplant program to increase shellfish hatchlings in the bay; establishing more spawning sanctuaries; and developing a long-term restoration plan for the upper bay.

What’s not among the recommendations? Pledges to add more nitrogen in the bay to offset the dozen wastewater treatment plants. Heavily advocated for by shellfisherman, who view a direct link between the cleanup of the bay and the decline in quahog landings, adding nitrogen was opposed by other commission members, including DEM. The state agency noted that it may not fix the decline in quahogs, and the state did not have enough data to pinpoint a number that would increase quahogs and satisfy the federal requirements in the federal Clean Water Act.

“We’re permit writers,” said David Borkman, a DEM environmental scientist who represented the department on the study commission. “At the end of the day we have to come up with a number.”

Borkman said there was not enough available data to make a proper determination whether increasing nitrogen would help, but said the department was open to creating a plan to study the issue.

Jim Boyd, a shellfisherman who up until a few years ago was the deputy chief for the Coastal Resources Management Council, acknowledged the difficulties of increasing nitrogen in the bay.

“We recognize with the department’s strong objection, the technical feasibility issues for the Narragansett Bay Commission, that it’s unlikely that would happen, but we’re still supporting it because it is feasible, and it should be explored,” Boyd said.

An industry that once boasted a vibrant local economy, with hundreds of quahoggers harvesting clams out of the bay, has now been whittled down to a couple dozen fishers, many of them slowly aging out of the industry. Representatives of the shellfishing industry on the study commission expressed concerns that quahogging as a vocation would vanish just as the quahogs are vanishing from the bay.

Commission members have, at times, clashed during the past eight months over why quahogs have declined in the bay, and what the state should do about it.

For quahoggers and shellfishermen, it’s a case of correlation very much equaling causation. The state’s shellfishermen have heavily advocated that the decrease in nitrogen from the state’s wastewater treatment plants is a key cause of the decline in quahogs over the past 20 years.

DEM has spent much of the past 21 years getting the dozen or so wastewater treatment plants that discharge in or around Narragansett Bay to reduce the amount of nitrogen associated with their discharges under the authority of the Clean Water Act, which dictates public waters must be fishable and swimmable. The inciting action to crack down on the treatment plants for DEM was the hypoxic event in Greenwich Bay in 2003, when a million menhaden died in the bay’s waters due to a lack of dissolved oxygen in the water.

Unfortunately, an easy answer as to declining quahogs is still unknown, as nitrogen isn’t the only thing that’s changed in Narragansett Bay. The impacts of climate change have seen waters in the bay increase over time, and as the bay has been cleaned up, quahogs’ natural predators are moving into waters that were previously vacant of most predators.

Commission chairs Rep. Joseph Solomon, D-Warwick, and Sen. Alana DiMario, D-North Kingstown, pledged to include more resources for DEM’s quahog transplant program within the state budget next month.

“We’re going to be in direct contact with the House and Senate Finance committees to include that in the budget,” Solomon told the commission. “It’s a very necessary thing to keep the industry going.”

Join the Discussion

View Comments

Recent Comments

  1. I’ve been harvesting seasonally full time for 7 years and have noticed environmental changes even in that short time.

    Also an issue however is the market. The current pricing structure, and low prices, make it difficult to lure in new fisherman. The capital investment of a boat and gear is not insignificant, and market prices havent changed, making it unappealing to enter the business.

  2. The beaches in southern Maine were filled with live quahogs last summer. We’re seeing more and more of them up here as the Gulf of Maine warms.

  3. One thing that never gets mentioned in this discussion. Shellfish thrived in the bay prior to the cities and pollution that accompanied the European invasion. How can more pollution help?

  4. The most valuable quahogs to the shellfish industry are the littlenecks. The one-inch hinge width minimum size means that a high percentage of harvested quahogs may not have spawned before being harvested. Those larvae that are produced are vulnerable to low dissolved oxygen and predators. Adding nitrogen is a ridiculous proposal. The daily possession limits should not be based upon upon volume. It should be changed to a count per day, which minimizes the number of pre-spawn clams harvested to insure sustainability.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your support keeps our reporters on the environmental beat.

Reader support is at the core of our nonprofit news model. Together, we can keep the environment in the headlines.

cookie

We use cookies to improve your experience and deliver personalized content. View Cookie Settings