A Frank Take

Ocean State On the Hook: Warming Coastal Waters Will Impact Fisheries, Tourism


Atlantic bluefin tuna are a popular catch off the Rhode Island coast. The species has been listed in various states of decline during the past few decades. (NOAA)

Since Rhode Island calls itself the Ocean State, hypes its beaches, named calamari the official state appetizer, paid to place unappetizing stuffie installations made of Styrofoam in airports around the country, and relies heavily on coastal tourism for its economic survival, it stands to reason its elected officials, business owners, residents, and visitors are concerned about the health of the planet’s marine waters, especially those that lap the local coastline and play host to squid and quahogs.

They should be. The Northwest Atlantic Ocean — southern New England’s coast sits in the middle of it — is among the planet’s fastest-warming marine waters.

“Climate-driven changes in the oceans are projected to yield an average increase of 1° to 6°C in sea surface temperatures by 2100, which is likely to have profound effects on marine ecosystems and the communities, businesses, and fisheries that rely on them,” according to a study published in August.

The life- and economy-sustaining marine ecosystem is vulnerable to human influences. There is a limit to the abuse the oceans can take and still function as the planet’s lungs and circulatory system.

The incessant burning of fossil fuels, the dragging of industrial fishing gear along the seafloor, overfishing, and the dumping — directly and indirectly — of so much of our waste into the ocean is changing its composition. Biodiversity in the world’s marine waters is rapidly declining. Corals are bleaching. The oceans are warming, acidifying, and plastifying. The saltwater system is dying, or at least running a high fever. It is sick.

“New England’s ocean is facing a crisis on multiple fronts,” said Priscilla Brooks, vice president of ocean conservation at the Conservation Law Foundation (CLF). “Climate change, overfishing, pollution, and habitat destruction are combining to dangerously affect marine life which, if left unchecked, does not bode well for the future of our ocean.”

Simply put, we need to start treating the marine environment better. In fact, we need to provide some universal health care. Many people living in this region, in fact, are troubled by the oceans’ current condition.

A recent CLF poll found that New Englanders are increasingly worried about ocean health. They cited polluted runoff, plastic, climate change, overfishing, and habitat and species loss as significant concerns. Respondents strongly preferred establishing protected areas to mitigate these threats.

We could also stop killing the oceans’ top predators.

Findings from the August study — titled “Widespread habitat loss and redistribution of marine top predators in a changing ocean” — could have a significant impact on southern New England fisheries, seafood consumers, and recreational anglers. The study, conducted by the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Falmouth, Mass., and published in the journal Science Advances, found highly migratory fish predators in the rapidly warming Northwest Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico could lose about 40% of their suitable habitat — nearly 70% for some — by the end of the century.

Atlantic bluefin tuna, a popular species commonly fished off the Ocean State coast, is one of the Northwest Atlantic Ocean species projected to be impacted by warming waters and habitat loss. Of the three bluefin species, the Atlantic is the largest, and has been listed in various states of endangerment during the past few decades.

Other iconic Rhode Island species, such as cod and lobster, have been moving north for a while. Once-abundant winter flounder is difficult to find.

In their place, southerly species are appearing more frequently (spot and ocean sunfish) and more unwanted guests are arriving (jellyfish that have an appetite for fish larvae and, in the summer, lionfish, a venomous and fast-reproducing fish with a voracious appetite).

Humans have been devouring ocean life for the past century. The cover story — titled “Net Losses” — of the May 15, 2003, issue of the journal Nature reported that only 10% of all large fish — both open-ocean species including tuna, swordfish, and marlin and large groundfish such as cod, halibut, skates, and flounder — are left in the sea. Most alarming, the study found industrial fisheries take only 10-15 years to decimate any new fish community they encounter to one-tenth of what it was before.

The study’s lead author noted that since the onset of industrialized fisheries, in 1950, “we have rapidly reduced the resource base to less than 10% — not just in some areas, not just for some stocks, but for entire communities of these large fish species from the tropics to the poles.”

Little has changed during the past two decades.

Thirty-seven percent of the world’s sharks and rays are threatened with extinction because of overfishing, loss and degradation of habitat, and climate change.

In a study published in 2014, the authors estimated that the biomass of predatory fish species declined by about 75% from 1910 to 2010.

Seafood consumers can slow — perhaps even stop — this large-fish carnage and help protect a stressed ecosystem.

Many consumers prefer predatory fish such as tuna, swordfish, rays, and sharks to species lower on the food web such as anchovies, sardines, and scup, which provides strong incentives for fishermen to catch the bigger fish.

This ongoing mass slaughter of large-fish populations has implications that go far beyond providing a supply of seafood that consumers prefer to eat. Predators keep prey populations in balance, and the loss of these fish can cause nutritional cascades through food webs that impact marine ecosystems.

For instance, in the absence of predators, grazers often flourish. This leads to a feeding frenzy on kelp and seagrasses, which provide ecosystem services and habitat and promote ecological stability. When removed, dead zones can last for decades.

The butchering of large predatory fish isn’t the only human activity changing the oceans’ makeup. The burning of fossil fuels has been steadily acidifying marine waters for the past 160 years.

That’s bad news for the Ocean State’s official appetizer. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution research has found squid — both predator and prey — are vulnerable to the acidic conditions that higher carbon dioxide levels create, and may face greater challenges to survival as the ocean acidifies.

Perhaps we should start thinking about a new state appetizer. But don’t make it stuffies. Ocean acidification will also negatively impact molluscs, including quahogs.

Frank Carini can be reached at [email protected]. His opinions don’t reflect those of ecoRI News.


Join the Discussion

View Comments

Recent Comments

  1. So Frank, you’re worried about might, or might not, happen in the next 70 years based upon a study, which in turn is based upon a model. Yet you’re not concerned about what is likely to happen in the next 5 years to the whale population if we put 2000+ wind turbines in the Outer Continental Shelf? I think that your priorities are misplaced. Ed Monaco

  2. Frank,
    Despite the propaganda of the past decade, there is no firm evidence that CO2 is the only or major contributor of global warming. Real scientists (like the renowned Dr. Richard Lindzen) have concluded there are numerous factors that we can’t control which are contributing to climate change. Were you aware that we are still at the later stages of the current ice age and the earth is warming? That the earth has gone through cycles in the past where the ocean was much much warmer? How would you feel if we killed our whales, destroyed our coastline and fisheries with the promise of “renewable energy”, and 50 years from now we are living in a poverty stricken state and thinking back of better days AND THE WATER IS EVEN WARMER! Yes, this will happen, if only you and others would stop being so narrow minded and single focused on a lie.

  3. Thanks for reporting the truth and the facts Frank. Humans, greed, and insatiable fossil fuel usage are the main cause of ocean and marine life destruction. Many humans are practicing sustainable means to lower the negative impacts on salt and fresh water ways. Too may still deny that humans and fossil fuel usage are to blame for the dire conditions we now face. I feel sorry for future generations who will live in the world we leave. Maybe humans will wake up and pay it forward.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your support keeps our reporters on the environmental beat.

Reader support is at the core of our nonprofit news model. Together, we can keep the environment in the headlines.


We use cookies to improve your experience and deliver personalized content. View Cookie Settings