Government

Senate, Rhode Island Grapple With Biosolids Disposal

Share

PROVIDENCE — More delays could be in the future for the proposed pyrolysis plant in North Kingstown, as lawmakers consider putting more skids on the development.

On the docket last week for lawmakers in the Senate Commerce Committee was S3224, which would put a one-year ban on all pyrolysis or thermal waste conversion plants in the Quonset area — the moratorium would expire next February — and S3225, which would put together a study commission to investigate the future of sludge disposal in Rhode Island.

Environmental news you can't miss
Get the latest ecoRI News stories in your inbox every Tuesday and Friday.
Environmental news you can't miss
Get the latest ecoRI News stories in your inbox every Tuesday and Friday.

The legislation comes on the heels of significant public criticism to a proposal from QSS Biosolids LLC to build a pyrolysis plant for wastewater sludge in the North Kingstown village of West Davisville.

If built, the plant would add to similar facilities in the Quonset area, including a biochar facility owned by a sister company of QSS Biosolids and an asphalt plant that has come under fire for its noxious odors. The biochar operation and the proposed pyrolysis facility are subsidiaries of Green Development LLC, with Mark DePasquale listed as owner of each.

“I don’t think the project has any place in the West Davisville portion of Quonset,”said Sen. Bridget Valverde, D-North Kingstown, who is sponsoring the one-year moratorium.

Unlike most jurisdictions, the Quonset area in North Kingstown is run entirely as a subsidiary of Rhode Island Commerce. In the past, it has been used to its advantage, as the Quonset Development Corporation, the quasi-public entity that handles day-to-day operations, courts companies such as defense contractors Electric Boat and Anduril to move facilities to Quonset-owned properties.

To a degree, most facilities are allowed to circumvent typical local building and zoning applications. It is something Quonset has been criticized before; earlier this year abutters and residents complained of a newly-operational asphalt plant owned and operated by Bitumar USA Inc., when the smells became overwhelming in the Davisville area.

North Kingstown residents have been mobilizing against the pyrolysis project, with some speaking in support of Valverde’s legislation and others in favor of a permanent ban on such facilities in Quonset.

“You’re being asked to make a choice tonight,” North Kingstown resident Vanessa Mascaro said at a recent committee hearing. “Either this type of site is appropriate next to schools, homes, families, and a sole source aquifer, or it’s not. And if it’s not, there’s no justification for allowing it next year.”

Richard Stang, an attorney from the Conservation Law Foundation, told Senate Commerce Committee members Rhode Island should pause any approvals of sludge disposal facilities until the state has studied the issue publicly.

“It’s not going anywhere,” Stang said. “This isn’t something you can just wish away.”

Rhode Island has a growing wastewater infrastructure issue. There are only two main plants that deal with sludge, the dewatered leftover solids from the treatment process. One is in Cranston and the other is in Woonsocket. Each one serves the surrounding community and treats millions of gallons of wastewater from homes and businesses daily.

The Woonsocket plant has come under scrutiny in recent years, from noxious odors reported by city residents. It is the subject of a class-action lawsuit. City officials have indicated their preference for the facility to be shut down, which would mean much of northern Rhode Island would have no place to ship their biosolid waste.

S3225 would create a 19-member commission to study the issue, including representatives from the state, the Narragansett Bay Commission, and the Department of Environmental Management, among others. The commission would have a special emphasis on the status of the Woonsocket facility, would investigate new technologies for disposal, and would have until the end of next January to issue its findings.

The Senate isn’t alone. In April, the House passed its own study commission, with an eye on creating a legal process to approve new sludge disposal facilities.

Both S3224 and S3225 were held for further study.

Categories

Join the Discussion

View Comments

Recent Comments

  1. Let’s Take Some Responsibility Rhode Island and Summer Quests

    It’s time for Rhode Islanders a and Summer Quests to do like the South Americans do and place one’s used toilet paper in a receptacle and not in the toilet to be wetted there, flushed, skimmed, removed, trucked, dried and finally incinerated near somebody else’s backyard!

  2. Nobody wants this. Nobody is going to want this. Mark my words, the godfathers of the state of Rhode Island will make Woonsocket “an offer it can’t refuse.” The burning will stay right there, and the odors will remain in the neighborhood just as they have for decades now. I pity pour Woonsocket residents. They should’ve never made that deal with the devil decades ago.

  3. Not often discussed is why the Woonsocket sludge incinerator is being closed. It is a currently operating sludge disposal site. Why indeed?

    Apparently, this operating site is owned and operated by the city of Woonsocket. The city government is tired of the responsibility and plans to close the site in the not too distant future. Yes, the responsibility is significant. But, why not consider the Sate of RI … RI DEM take the site over and upgrade it to best available current technology. The site and the land could be acquired by the Eminent Domain powers of the sate for little or no cost, make the necessary upgrades and operate the site as a state owned and operated facility. Why close it and install a new site near several public schools and close to many residential ares with all the necessary construction and potential North Kingstown ground water pollution issues??

  4. With due respect, the “necessary upgrades” have been done. Over and over. Promises made; promises not kept. The stink remains.

  5. Seems my public comment regarding fish and pharmaceuticals in the water and in biosolids applies to this article too. What timing!!! Hope people read my research!!!

  6. Your concern for the school children and homeowners is admirable, but I doubt the proposal for Quonset is less than 2000 feet from a school and 250 feet from the nearest residential neighbor. Nothing will remove the odor sufficiently to make it tolerable to them. Sorry, Woonsocket has had enough of the state treating it like the red headed step child.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your support keeps our reporters on the environmental beat.

Reader support is at the core of our nonprofit news model. Together, we can keep the environment in the headlines.

cookie
Español
Share
BLUESKY